Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Heavy Artillery: Psion vs. Wizard
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thanee" data-source="post: 1747556" data-attributes="member: 478"><p>Cute! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ahem. Plenty powers <em>are</em> (globes of invulnerability aside, which really is an almost neglectible factor) upgradeable to the power of a higher level. Powers do not work like spells on that behalf, they actually become higher level versions of themselves effectively (except for the actual level, which stays the same, of course). Arcane Construct? Dominate? Suggestion? Dispel? Just to name some random examples.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How does full augmentation not factor this in!?</p><p></p><p>I compared fully augmented powers with spells there. Only fully augmented powers!</p><p></p><p>Please tell me, how full augmentation does not factor in the scaling of arcane spells.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>*blink*</p><p></p><p>Not better?</p><p></p><p>Well, taking the fireball example, if you consider a +2 DC, +10 damage, chooseable save type and energy type not better, than I cannot help you, I guess. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What kind of completely useless comparison is this!? Who cares for these numbers, they have no bearing on actual game play. My numbers do, they show what the classes can <em>actually</em> do and are no hypothetical statistics with no meaning, multiplying some random numbers with other random numbers. Yes, I understand what you are getting at, but what does it show to add up those numbers, that sorcerers look better, if you add up the whole scaling they get and compare it to a psion removed of all advantages they have? Wow! Genius!</p><p></p><p>And you honestly tell me I would neglect something there? Doh! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>*scratches head* Now you lost me... or did I lose you above? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And the next thing you say is, that the scribing cost is a neglectable cost factor, huh? Suuure! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> Maybe at epic levels... but my 12th level wizardess had to spend a <em>considerable</em> amount of gold on her spellbook alone, to get this broad selection wizards <em>have</em>.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, of course wizards would not upgrade the spells they actually use (either directly to a higher level version of the same spell, or something fairly similar)... why should they!?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>"Way more" is a huge overstatement, but more, of course, maybe 20% or so. However 15 minutes to instant is still quite some difference. Not everytime, but also leaving slots open means to have less spells available at the moment. Yes, this ability is good, I'm using it extensively when I play wizards, but it's not even in the same ball park as spontaneous casting.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And way too little as shown above, since they can keep up with the sorcerer quite good, even if they pay full price for every power they manifest. If you go down to an augmentation level, which makes the effect of the power compareable to the spells of the sorcerer, which is not the maximum possible, mind you, the numbers look even worse, but I deliberately chose a point, which would be extremely slanted against the psion (full augmentation on all powers means the quickest way to blast through all those PP, so the cost you mention all the time is at its peak there), and even then, things do not look <em>that</em> bad, I'd say. If I look at all the stuff I've listed, which psions get over sorcerers, then I can with absolute confidence say, that this cost is not enough!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yep, sure. Stacking the deck, since I compare the psion to the best ability from each sorcerer (spells per day) and wizard (spells known) instead of the weakest... Stacking the deck against the arcanists maybe... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>Bye</p><p>Thanee</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thanee, post: 1747556, member: 478"] Cute! :D Ahem. Plenty powers [i]are[/i] (globes of invulnerability aside, which really is an almost neglectible factor) upgradeable to the power of a higher level. Powers do not work like spells on that behalf, they actually become higher level versions of themselves effectively (except for the actual level, which stays the same, of course). Arcane Construct? Dominate? Suggestion? Dispel? Just to name some random examples. How does full augmentation not factor this in!? I compared fully augmented powers with spells there. Only fully augmented powers! Please tell me, how full augmentation does not factor in the scaling of arcane spells. *blink* Not better? Well, taking the fireball example, if you consider a +2 DC, +10 damage, chooseable save type and energy type not better, than I cannot help you, I guess. ;) What kind of completely useless comparison is this!? Who cares for these numbers, they have no bearing on actual game play. My numbers do, they show what the classes can [i]actually[/i] do and are no hypothetical statistics with no meaning, multiplying some random numbers with other random numbers. Yes, I understand what you are getting at, but what does it show to add up those numbers, that sorcerers look better, if you add up the whole scaling they get and compare it to a psion removed of all advantages they have? Wow! Genius! And you honestly tell me I would neglect something there? Doh! ;) *scratches head* Now you lost me... or did I lose you above? ;) And the next thing you say is, that the scribing cost is a neglectable cost factor, huh? Suuure! :D Maybe at epic levels... but my 12th level wizardess had to spend a [i]considerable[/i] amount of gold on her spellbook alone, to get this broad selection wizards [i]have[/i]. Yeah, of course wizards would not upgrade the spells they actually use (either directly to a higher level version of the same spell, or something fairly similar)... why should they!? "Way more" is a huge overstatement, but more, of course, maybe 20% or so. However 15 minutes to instant is still quite some difference. Not everytime, but also leaving slots open means to have less spells available at the moment. Yes, this ability is good, I'm using it extensively when I play wizards, but it's not even in the same ball park as spontaneous casting. And way too little as shown above, since they can keep up with the sorcerer quite good, even if they pay full price for every power they manifest. If you go down to an augmentation level, which makes the effect of the power compareable to the spells of the sorcerer, which is not the maximum possible, mind you, the numbers look even worse, but I deliberately chose a point, which would be extremely slanted against the psion (full augmentation on all powers means the quickest way to blast through all those PP, so the cost you mention all the time is at its peak there), and even then, things do not look [i]that[/i] bad, I'd say. If I look at all the stuff I've listed, which psions get over sorcerers, then I can with absolute confidence say, that this cost is not enough! Yep, sure. Stacking the deck, since I compare the psion to the best ability from each sorcerer (spells per day) and wizard (spells known) instead of the weakest... Stacking the deck against the arcanists maybe... :p Bye Thanee [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Heavy Artillery: Psion vs. Wizard
Top