Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Heighten Spell + another Metamagic feat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="apsuman" data-source="post: 1529119" data-attributes="member: 1769"><p>I really hate having to say "Well the sage said X so that's official, I guess I was wrong." because it is so unsatisfying.</p><p></p><p>I will try to make this my last attempt to explain the feat (at least in this thread) and how it stack by MY interpretation of what the PHB says.</p><p></p><p>Since the various meta magic feats do not "see" each other when they are applied to a spell there can be no order of operation precedence. An empowered maximized fireball is the same as a maximized empowered fireball.</p><p></p><p>So you have a base spell, Burning Hands. You maximize it, this requires the caster to use a slot three levels higher. Everyone agrees up to this point.</p><p></p><p>Now you also want to heighten it. You heighten it by three levels. This has two effects, it raises the actual spell level by three spell levels at a cost of requiring a slot three levels higher.</p><p></p><p>So caster Ned is maximizeing and heightening and the result is that burning hands is now a fourth level spell in a seventh level slot because the three slot raises from the maximize and the three levels from the heighten combine.</p><p></p><p>That said, I think they could have done a better job wording the heighten feat.</p><p></p><p>Also, you are free to change it in your game. While I think it would be unbalancing it would be a rather small imbalance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="apsuman, post: 1529119, member: 1769"] I really hate having to say "Well the sage said X so that's official, I guess I was wrong." because it is so unsatisfying. I will try to make this my last attempt to explain the feat (at least in this thread) and how it stack by MY interpretation of what the PHB says. Since the various meta magic feats do not "see" each other when they are applied to a spell there can be no order of operation precedence. An empowered maximized fireball is the same as a maximized empowered fireball. So you have a base spell, Burning Hands. You maximize it, this requires the caster to use a slot three levels higher. Everyone agrees up to this point. Now you also want to heighten it. You heighten it by three levels. This has two effects, it raises the actual spell level by three spell levels at a cost of requiring a slot three levels higher. So caster Ned is maximizeing and heightening and the result is that burning hands is now a fourth level spell in a seventh level slot because the three slot raises from the maximize and the three levels from the heighten combine. That said, I think they could have done a better job wording the heighten feat. Also, you are free to change it in your game. While I think it would be unbalancing it would be a rather small imbalance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Heighten Spell + another Metamagic feat
Top