Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mark CMG" data-source="post: 5756377" data-attributes="member: 10479">Indeed.&nbsp; As is mine.&nbsp; However you keep quoting me and objecting to my preferences as if my preferences have to overcome your objections.&nbsp; I have indeed.&nbsp; It is one of the possibilities of the Doctor Who character that they have yet to explore in nearly fifty years and since they don't manage to have a 100% track record with episodes and Doctors being top notch, there's no reason not to try out this long overlooked territory.&nbsp; If it had always been a great series, I'd argue against messing with success, but they've had ups and downs.&nbsp; That's the argument in a nutshell.(I'm going to ignore your absurdist argument regarding &quot;Toddler Who&quot; despite the success of Muppet Babies.&nbsp; You should probably not bothering bringing it up with me moving forward.)But as long as we're examining one another's arguments so closely, what of your objections?&nbsp; Your main argument seems to boil down to 'just because they can doesn't mean they should' rather than any real concrete objection to trying something different.&nbsp; Care to give it a better try, while leaving out the absurdists examples, beyond it just not appealing to you?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mark CMG, post: 5756377, member: 10479"] Indeed. As is mine. However you keep quoting me and objecting to my preferences as if my preferences have to overcome your objections. I have indeed. It is one of the possibilities of the Doctor Who character that they have yet to explore in nearly fifty years and since they don't manage to have a 100% track record with episodes and Doctors being top notch, there's no reason not to try out this long overlooked territory. If it had always been a great series, I'd argue against messing with success, but they've had ups and downs. That's the argument in a nutshell. (I'm going to ignore your absurdist argument regarding "Toddler Who" despite the success of Muppet Babies. You should probably not bothering bringing it up with me moving forward.) But as long as we're examining one another's arguments so closely, what of your objections? Your main argument seems to boil down to 'just because they can doesn't mean they should' rather than any real concrete objection to trying something different. Care to give it a better try, while leaving out the absurdists examples, beyond it just not appealing to you? [/QUOTE]

Verification