Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
Hello, I am lawyer with a PSA: almost everyone is wrong about the OGL and SRD. Clearing up confusion.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="robconley" data-source="post: 8882473" data-attributes="member: 5636"><p>Oh? And where is this magical manpower that Wizards conjured up that singerly handily expanded the D&D to its largest audience ever?</p><p></p><p>I understand what you are trying to say here and I apologize for the sarcastic tone. But figuring out how D&D expanded to its largest audience ever is about the logistics of how people become aware of D&D in the first place. And the answer is pretty obvious when you consider the logistics.</p><p></p><p>Historically Wizard's staff devoted to D&D has been relatively small. Much of their creative and logistical support was outsourced to freelancers and licensed outlets. But those outlets and freelancers are dwarfed by the number of people actively involved in publishing RPG whether it is 3PP or not. The 2010s saw a huge expansion of creative output across the board enabled by the low barriers to publication created by the internet and digital technology. What is relevant here is not the sales or dollar volume here but the social network effect of all these creatives.</p><p></p><p>Whatever the ratio is it magnified that most of these folks are referee types which mean they are surrounded by a far larger group of folks just here to play. </p><p></p><p>But then growing throughout the 2010s is what I would call effective third party promotion. Sure we had blogs, articles, zines, and forums, but the rise of Youtube and more importantly the examples of the effective use of Youtube like the one set by the Critical Role crew meant that now instead mostly referee types being plugged into the wider hobby, we see more the wider player base becoming engage.</p><p></p><p>The next piece of the puzzle is the goodwill generated by the runup and initial release of D&D 5e. While it didn't have a open content SRD until later the "era of good feeling" meant that for several years D&D 5e became everybody's 2nd favorite RPG. For this Wizards at the time deserve the credit for being the primary movers behind this. </p><p></p><p>But this set the stage for a multiplier effect on 5e when effective third party promotion started to come into play. As a well-liked system, the decentralized network of promotors started talking up 5e. Then the OGL was released along with popular programs like the DM's Guild, D&D Beyond, and licensed content for VTTs. </p><p></p><p>The stage was set for a larger consumer market to become aware of the potential of tabletop roleplaying and D&D 5e. When lockdowns of the pandemic came into the picture, many turned to the internet for their primary form of entertainment and social interaction. The odds of an unconnected individual stumbling on something RPG or D&D related was at a high point. This ignited sales of 5e and propelled D&D and the hobby to its high point.</p><p></p><p>This is the nuts and bolts of how the current market situation with D&D came to be. Wizards is responsible only for the goodwill in the 5e runup, and the then-current licensing situation. The rest was driven by third parties. </p><p></p><p></p><p>This is a case of bad generalship plain and simple. The executive at Wizards are fighting the last war and failed to consider how the battlefield works today. If they were good generals then they would be aware that by restricting people's use of the original content they created is a lines that when crossed will ignite a firestorm of criticism and a collapse of the value of their goodwill.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="robconley, post: 8882473, member: 5636"] Oh? And where is this magical manpower that Wizards conjured up that singerly handily expanded the D&D to its largest audience ever? I understand what you are trying to say here and I apologize for the sarcastic tone. But figuring out how D&D expanded to its largest audience ever is about the logistics of how people become aware of D&D in the first place. And the answer is pretty obvious when you consider the logistics. Historically Wizard's staff devoted to D&D has been relatively small. Much of their creative and logistical support was outsourced to freelancers and licensed outlets. But those outlets and freelancers are dwarfed by the number of people actively involved in publishing RPG whether it is 3PP or not. The 2010s saw a huge expansion of creative output across the board enabled by the low barriers to publication created by the internet and digital technology. What is relevant here is not the sales or dollar volume here but the social network effect of all these creatives. Whatever the ratio is it magnified that most of these folks are referee types which mean they are surrounded by a far larger group of folks just here to play. But then growing throughout the 2010s is what I would call effective third party promotion. Sure we had blogs, articles, zines, and forums, but the rise of Youtube and more importantly the examples of the effective use of Youtube like the one set by the Critical Role crew meant that now instead mostly referee types being plugged into the wider hobby, we see more the wider player base becoming engage. The next piece of the puzzle is the goodwill generated by the runup and initial release of D&D 5e. While it didn't have a open content SRD until later the "era of good feeling" meant that for several years D&D 5e became everybody's 2nd favorite RPG. For this Wizards at the time deserve the credit for being the primary movers behind this. But this set the stage for a multiplier effect on 5e when effective third party promotion started to come into play. As a well-liked system, the decentralized network of promotors started talking up 5e. Then the OGL was released along with popular programs like the DM's Guild, D&D Beyond, and licensed content for VTTs. The stage was set for a larger consumer market to become aware of the potential of tabletop roleplaying and D&D 5e. When lockdowns of the pandemic came into the picture, many turned to the internet for their primary form of entertainment and social interaction. The odds of an unconnected individual stumbling on something RPG or D&D related was at a high point. This ignited sales of 5e and propelled D&D and the hobby to its high point. This is the nuts and bolts of how the current market situation with D&D came to be. Wizards is responsible only for the goodwill in the 5e runup, and the then-current licensing situation. The rest was driven by third parties. This is a case of bad generalship plain and simple. The executive at Wizards are fighting the last war and failed to consider how the battlefield works today. If they were good generals then they would be aware that by restricting people's use of the original content they created is a lines that when crossed will ignite a firestorm of criticism and a collapse of the value of their goodwill. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
Hello, I am lawyer with a PSA: almost everyone is wrong about the OGL and SRD. Clearing up confusion.
Top