Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 8883723" data-attributes="member: 6795602">Everyone.Section 9 says to the licensee: "you may used any authorized version of this License to copy, modify and distribute any open Game content originally distributed under any version of this License".Since authorization is ambiguous, WOTC would be making the argument that they have sole prerogative in determining what versions of the OGL are currently authorized and which are not.  Contrast with the hypothetical - 'you can use any version of this License that has ever been authorized at the time of your Use to copy, modify and distribute any open Game content originally distributed under any version of this License'.  *Note I don't think this is a great argument but it's certainly one they can make.Only one that they can argue is implied within the license agreement.It doesn't seem to me to match what we have seen from the leaks.  Also, you could be right, but it feels more like you are saying this is how a reasonable company would likely do things and i'm not sure WOTC is being a reasonable company at the moment.I'm not understanding the significance of this observationIf they deauthorize OGL 1.0a for all then it would effectively revoke all their existing license agreements utilizing OGL 1.0a as well.</blockquote>