Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 8884075" data-attributes="member: 42582">I agree it's clearly a summary or gloss, not the licence text.I assume that WotC, when they wrote that, were proposing to retract their standing offer to license their SRD under the OGL v 1.0a, and replace that with an offer to license under the new OGL v 1.1, on Jan 13. In which case what they say would be true if you want to enter into a licence directly with WotC. To me, they seem to be sidestepping the issue of sub-licensing from an existing licensee, or (if one is already an existing licensee) continuing to exercise one's rights. (This is the issue that [USER=463]@S'mon[/USER] and I have been discussing - see eg my post 577 not far upthread.)Perhaps WotC really believe that they enjoy some unilateral power to terminate all the licence agreements they've entered into in respect of their existing SRD, but that seems improbable to me.</blockquote>