Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Greg Benage" data-source="post: 8884136" data-attributes="member: 93631">I'm not a lawyer, but I think what we're seeing is a combination of excerpts from 1.1 drafts and propaganda from WotC, and the two are all mixed up together. All of the "deauthorization" stuff might fall purely into the propaganda category.If WotC did take legal action against a publisher, I'd expect a three- (er, four-) pronged attack:1. OGL 1.0a doesn't say it's irrevocable, which is the clearest possible evidence that we did not intend it to be irrevocable.2. This publisher violated our copyright by using work that was not released as Open Game Content (many counts and exhibits here).3. This publisher is otherwise in breach of the agreement (many counts and exhibits related to Section 15s, etc.)4. Even if the court rules against us on (1), if the court finds violations on (2) or (3), the license allows us to terminate.</blockquote>