Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
Hello, I am lawyer with a PSA: almost everyone is wrong about the OGL and SRD. Clearing up confusion.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bmcdaniel" data-source="post: 8886776" data-attributes="member: 1772"><p>It is difficult to give a hard doctrinal answer to this question. As a practical matter, the question does not come up frequently, so is not covered by the standard treatises or leading cases. I'd be surprised if there is not some caselaw on the subject, but precisely because it is a rare question, the caselaw will be obscure. This is what I meant when I remarked in my prior post that it is "likely that the doctrinal basis is under-theorized as a matter of law."</p><p></p><p>However (as [USER=20741]@Steel_Wind[/USER] would be sure to point out), no court is going to allow <em>anything</em> to be acceptance by performance. For example, no court is going to enforce the agreement "You agree to give me $1 million. You accept this agreement by breathing" based on the claim that somebody accepted it by breathing. The fact that the doctrinal basis for this limitation is uncertain or under-specified does not mean that the limit does not exist. As [USER=20741]@Steel_Wind[/USER] has noted, contract law does not attempt to be comprehensive; it attempts to settle only those claims that are actually brought before the court.</p><p></p><p>(If you doubt this, I would encourage you to post the following offer and agreement on your website: "WOTC, pursuant to this agreement, you agree to permanently transfer to me all intellectual property related to D&D for $1. WOTC may accept this offer by using the word 'fantasy' in any communication.")</p><p></p><p>Furthermore, as a practical matter, the question is even less relevant than the above implies. Offer and acceptance are questions of <u>fact</u> that are analyzed by a court to determine if there was the mutual assent necessary to form an agreement. In court, vague and ambiguous facts are analyzed <u>afterwards</u> to determine whether there was mutual assent by virtue of acceptance of an offer. However, on a prospective basis, it is relatively easy for a person to create facts showing that the person does not accept the offer, even if their activities would otherwise suggest they do accept, e.g. by putting the offeror on notice that the offer is not accepted. </p><p>----------------------------------</p><p>To repeat myself: There are exceptions to everything, including things I've said above. If you want to know all the complexity and nuance, don't look in a forum post. Moreover, even if the advice correctly applies to your situation, there may be consequences that apply to you that are not explored. The fact that I don't know what exceptions, complexity, nuance and consequences are applicable to your specific situation is one reason (among many) that this is not legal advice. So, I'll say what you hear so many lawyers say. This is not legal advice. I am not your lawyer. You can rely on my legal advice only when we have discussed your specific situation and you have entered into an engagement letter with me or my law firm, and have agreed to pay me or my law firm for the provision of legal advice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bmcdaniel, post: 8886776, member: 1772"] It is difficult to give a hard doctrinal answer to this question. As a practical matter, the question does not come up frequently, so is not covered by the standard treatises or leading cases. I'd be surprised if there is not some caselaw on the subject, but precisely because it is a rare question, the caselaw will be obscure. This is what I meant when I remarked in my prior post that it is "likely that the doctrinal basis is under-theorized as a matter of law." However (as [USER=20741]@Steel_Wind[/USER] would be sure to point out), no court is going to allow [I]anything[/I] to be acceptance by performance. For example, no court is going to enforce the agreement "You agree to give me $1 million. You accept this agreement by breathing" based on the claim that somebody accepted it by breathing. The fact that the doctrinal basis for this limitation is uncertain or under-specified does not mean that the limit does not exist. As [USER=20741]@Steel_Wind[/USER] has noted, contract law does not attempt to be comprehensive; it attempts to settle only those claims that are actually brought before the court. (If you doubt this, I would encourage you to post the following offer and agreement on your website: "WOTC, pursuant to this agreement, you agree to permanently transfer to me all intellectual property related to D&D for $1. WOTC may accept this offer by using the word 'fantasy' in any communication.") Furthermore, as a practical matter, the question is even less relevant than the above implies. Offer and acceptance are questions of [U]fact[/U] that are analyzed by a court to determine if there was the mutual assent necessary to form an agreement. In court, vague and ambiguous facts are analyzed [U]afterwards[/U] to determine whether there was mutual assent by virtue of acceptance of an offer. However, on a prospective basis, it is relatively easy for a person to create facts showing that the person does not accept the offer, even if their activities would otherwise suggest they do accept, e.g. by putting the offeror on notice that the offer is not accepted. ---------------------------------- To repeat myself: There are exceptions to everything, including things I've said above. If you want to know all the complexity and nuance, don't look in a forum post. Moreover, even if the advice correctly applies to your situation, there may be consequences that apply to you that are not explored. The fact that I don't know what exceptions, complexity, nuance and consequences are applicable to your specific situation is one reason (among many) that this is not legal advice. So, I'll say what you hear so many lawyers say. This is not legal advice. I am not your lawyer. You can rely on my legal advice only when we have discussed your specific situation and you have entered into an engagement letter with me or my law firm, and have agreed to pay me or my law firm for the provision of legal advice. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
Hello, I am lawyer with a PSA: almost everyone is wrong about the OGL and SRD. Clearing up confusion.
Top