Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Cadence" data-source="post: 8888216" data-attributes="member: 6701124">I'm taking the document that's out being something WotC said to at least some people.And so it kind of feels like it's what WotC said they wanted?"previously available OGL 1.0(a), which is no longer an authorized license agreement.""What if I don’t like these terms and don’t agree to the OGL: Commercial? That’s fine – it just means that you cannot earn income from any SRD-based D&D content you create on or after January 13, 2023, and you will need to either operate under the new OGL: NonCommercial or strike a custom direct deal with Wizards of the Coast for your project. But if you want to publish SRD-based content on or after January 13, 2023 and commercialize it, your only option is to agree to the OGL: Commercial"It feels very implausible to me that the document didn't originate with WotC.  And even if they want to take it back, it feels like it proclaims the thinking of some folks pretty high up.</blockquote>