Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Enrahim2" data-source="post: 8888433" data-attributes="member: 7039850">Yes. But I think when they wrote this document they had similar thinking as me, and didn't really think that it could be construed as an attempt at actually revoking 1.0a, as they thought that was well established and obvious from a legal standpoint would be impossible. First when this blew out with the perfect Gizmodo coctail of cherry picking, and looking at the reaction that caused they were even beginning to think that this indeed not only were an extremely potent chilling bomb, but even might have legal legs to stand on thanks to the dozens of lawyers they got to investigate into this narrow unthinkable possiblility for free for them.Of course they need time to think this trough! This could be their opportunity of a lifetime. If they had right away gotten out and clarified their initial position, they would potentially never be able to proceed down this new and unexpected avenue again. Not to mention the unexpected leverage they suddenly got over the entire 1.0a community.We might be heading towards 1.0a being effectively revoked. But if wizards actually decide to take that path, I would blame Gizmodo more than them.</blockquote>