Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Enrahim2" data-source="post: 8890034" data-attributes="member: 7039850">We are completely aligned until this statement. We don't know what wizards is thinking. I agree that your suggestion here might match most of the evidence, however I think my hypotesis matches more of it (weird definition of "unlisenced content" unless seen in context of 1.0a being available, the weird coice of wording for the revocation, their touted backwards compatibility that gets weakened if users cannot enjoy old third party content, the missing response to this situation, missing provissions for users to build on each others work)I do however start accepting that this is such an obvious interpretation that wizards cannot have missed it, and published it hoping it would be read that way. It might even be that they anticipated a leak and are milking the situation now for leverage with 3PP and the publicity they get when they anounce their planned big reveal.Speculating about others can be very hard when there are a distinct chance they are playing high stakes gambling with the masses.</blockquote>