Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
Hello, I am lawyer with a PSA: almost everyone is wrong about the OGL and SRD. Clearing up confusion.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 8891895" data-attributes="member: 7023840"><p>Yeah, no. If I didn't want to be anonymous, I wouldn't post anonymously.</p><p></p><p>I always write that on the internet, no one knows you're a dog. But if you keep posting that you're a good boy and deserve some kibble, people can figure it out pretty quickly - and without you having to tell them, too!</p><p></p><p>Anyway, as you know, most of the people here wouldn't know the fine distinctions regarding legal professionals that would matter.* Some time ago, on a different forum, there was a poster who was wrong (egregiously so) about a topic in the law- it was clear that not only was he unfamiliar with that area of the law, further, he was hopelessly clueless about how the law works <em>in practice</em>. After a while, he revealed (in the whole, "Do you know who you're talking to?" manner that was ... unfortunate) who he was. And he happened to be a law professor who I respected immensely- the type of person that writes books and treatises that are used in law schools across the nation. Unfortunately, he made the mistake of trying to be authoritative about an area of the law he didn't understand, as well as not understanding the difference between the academic understanding of law and how law works in practice.*</p><p></p><p></p><p>*To be honest, as amusing as it was to be lectured on American law by a Canadian practitioner, why bother? This is supposed to be <em>fun, </em>right?</p><p></p><p>**"Pick up a copy of any law review that you see, . . . and the first article is likely to be . . . the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in 18th-century Bulgaria, or something, which I’m sure was of great interest to the academic that wrote it, but isn’t of much help to the bar." <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 8891895, member: 7023840"] Yeah, no. If I didn't want to be anonymous, I wouldn't post anonymously. I always write that on the internet, no one knows you're a dog. But if you keep posting that you're a good boy and deserve some kibble, people can figure it out pretty quickly - and without you having to tell them, too! Anyway, as you know, most of the people here wouldn't know the fine distinctions regarding legal professionals that would matter.* Some time ago, on a different forum, there was a poster who was wrong (egregiously so) about a topic in the law- it was clear that not only was he unfamiliar with that area of the law, further, he was hopelessly clueless about how the law works [I]in practice[/I]. After a while, he revealed (in the whole, "Do you know who you're talking to?" manner that was ... unfortunate) who he was. And he happened to be a law professor who I respected immensely- the type of person that writes books and treatises that are used in law schools across the nation. Unfortunately, he made the mistake of trying to be authoritative about an area of the law he didn't understand, as well as not understanding the difference between the academic understanding of law and how law works in practice.* *To be honest, as amusing as it was to be lectured on American law by a Canadian practitioner, why bother? This is supposed to be [I]fun, [/I]right? **"Pick up a copy of any law review that you see, . . . and the first article is likely to be . . . the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in 18th-century Bulgaria, or something, which I’m sure was of great interest to the academic that wrote it, but isn’t of much help to the bar." :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
Hello, I am lawyer with a PSA: almost everyone is wrong about the OGL and SRD. Clearing up confusion.
Top