Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
Hello, I am lawyer with a PSA: almost everyone is wrong about the OGL and SRD. Clearing up confusion.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bmcdaniel" data-source="post: 8892011" data-attributes="member: 1772"><p>I'm not sure what kind of example you are asking for, at least in part because (as mentioned in my post) I agree that US litigation tends to be more procedural than non-US litigation, so I think we are in agreement there.</p><p></p><p>Where I would differ is spreading that generalization about litigation to "the law" generally. In my own practice of investment management, the US has many, many rules that give discretion to regulators to take action on a "know it when I see it basis." </p><p></p><p>For example, Section 48 of the Investment Company Act states "It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, to cause to be done any act or thing through or by means of any other person which it would be unlawful for such person to do under the provisions of this title or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder." In other words, you cannot comply with the Act merely by technical, formal compliance; you must actually comply with the intent of the Act. I don't believe there is any similar rule (and certainly practitioners don't act like there is any such rule) in the regulation of investment vehicles in the UK and elsewhere.</p><p></p><p>A second example: Delaware partnership law includes an unwaiveable obligation for the partners to act in "good faith" to each other, i.e. to comply with the spirit of the agreement, not merely its technical expression. No such obligatory requirement exists in the partnership law of England and Wales.</p><p></p><p>A third example: Foreign investment in the United States is controlled by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, aka CFIUS. CFIUS is granted very broad discretionary powers to deny foreign investments, or require foreign investors to dis-invest. This is markedly different from rules governing foreign investments in other jurisdictions (UK, Japan, Australia, Taiwan) which give investors rules to follow, and if an investor follows the rules, then their foreign investment is safe.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bmcdaniel, post: 8892011, member: 1772"] I'm not sure what kind of example you are asking for, at least in part because (as mentioned in my post) I agree that US litigation tends to be more procedural than non-US litigation, so I think we are in agreement there. Where I would differ is spreading that generalization about litigation to "the law" generally. In my own practice of investment management, the US has many, many rules that give discretion to regulators to take action on a "know it when I see it basis." For example, Section 48 of the Investment Company Act states "It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, to cause to be done any act or thing through or by means of any other person which it would be unlawful for such person to do under the provisions of this title or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder." In other words, you cannot comply with the Act merely by technical, formal compliance; you must actually comply with the intent of the Act. I don't believe there is any similar rule (and certainly practitioners don't act like there is any such rule) in the regulation of investment vehicles in the UK and elsewhere. A second example: Delaware partnership law includes an unwaiveable obligation for the partners to act in "good faith" to each other, i.e. to comply with the spirit of the agreement, not merely its technical expression. No such obligatory requirement exists in the partnership law of England and Wales. A third example: Foreign investment in the United States is controlled by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, aka CFIUS. CFIUS is granted very broad discretionary powers to deny foreign investments, or require foreign investors to dis-invest. This is markedly different from rules governing foreign investments in other jurisdictions (UK, Japan, Australia, Taiwan) which give investors rules to follow, and if an investor follows the rules, then their foreign investment is safe. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
Hello, I am lawyer with a PSA: almost everyone is wrong about the OGL and SRD. Clearing up confusion.
Top