Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
Hello, I am lawyer with a PSA: almost everyone is wrong about the OGL and SRD. Clearing up confusion.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 8892222" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>Or rather, it requires you to offer to licence the OGC that you use to all comers - and some of those licences may be sub-licences. I think this point is not merely pedantic, as it helps inform the final part of this post.</p><p></p><p>This is the point that [USER=463]@S'mon[/USER] and I were making from around the time of the press release - see eg this thread: <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/the-ogl-1-1-is-not-an-open-license.693981/" target="_blank">OGL - The OGL 1.1 is not an Open License</a></p><p></p><p>That's not clear to me. Section 4 of the OGL v 1.0a reads "In consideration for agreeing to use this License, the Contributors grant You a perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free, nonexclusive license with the exact terms of this License to Use, the Open Game Content." What does "the Open Game Content" refer to here? The OGC that you have actually used? Or the OGC that is found in the document that has been licensed to you, and cited by you in your Section 15 declaration?</p><p></p><p>And which OGC, then, is covered by your sub-licences?</p><p></p><p>I don't think either answer is obviously the right one. (It may not matter which is correct, either, given that we have hypertext SRDs.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 8892222, member: 42582"] Or rather, it requires you to offer to licence the OGC that you use to all comers - and some of those licences may be sub-licences. I think this point is not merely pedantic, as it helps inform the final part of this post. This is the point that [USER=463]@S'mon[/USER] and I were making from around the time of the press release - see eg this thread: [URL="https://www.enworld.org/threads/the-ogl-1-1-is-not-an-open-license.693981/"]OGL - The OGL 1.1 is not an Open License[/URL] That's not clear to me. Section 4 of the OGL v 1.0a reads "In consideration for agreeing to use this License, the Contributors grant You a perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free, nonexclusive license with the exact terms of this License to Use, the Open Game Content." What does "the Open Game Content" refer to here? The OGC that you have actually used? Or the OGC that is found in the document that has been licensed to you, and cited by you in your Section 15 declaration? And which OGC, then, is covered by your sub-licences? I don't think either answer is obviously the right one. (It may not matter which is correct, either, given that we have hypertext SRDs.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
Hello, I am lawyer with a PSA: almost everyone is wrong about the OGL and SRD. Clearing up confusion.
Top