Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 8900171" data-attributes="member: 22779">And this is why I’m so reluctant to voice an opinion. Anything other than 100%, full agreement with you is “defending WotC all the way”. No it isn’t. It’s just that no I haven’t locked my opinion into one and only one interpretation to the absolute exclusion of any other thoughts. I’ve seen multiple posters talking about how this will destroy WotC. They are going to lose millions of dollars. They are going to fail. So on and so forth.I mean good grief [USER=5636]@estar[/USER] above is guessing that 40% of DnD players will jump ship over this. 40% of players didn’t even go to Pathfinder during the 4e days. I think it’s probably closer to about 10% might jump ship. And if that’s true, then why wouldn’t WotC push ogl 2.0 forward?&nbsp; The losses are pretty minor and they gain complete control over DnD going forward.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 8900171, member: 22779"] And this is why I’m so reluctant to voice an opinion. Anything other than 100%, full agreement with you is “defending WotC all the way”. No it isn’t. It’s just that no I haven’t locked my opinion into one and only one interpretation to the absolute exclusion of any other thoughts. I’ve seen multiple posters talking about how this will destroy WotC. They are going to lose millions of dollars. They are going to fail. So on and so forth. I mean good grief [USER=5636]@estar[/USER] above is guessing that 40% of DnD players will jump ship over this. 40% of players didn’t even go to Pathfinder during the 4e days. I think it’s probably closer to about 10% might jump ship. And if that’s true, then why wouldn’t WotC push ogl 2.0 forward? The losses are pretty minor and they gain complete control over DnD going forward. [/QUOTE]

Verification