Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="gban007" data-source="post: 8902739" data-attributes="member: 56488">Seems a bit ironic posting this in a thread where lawyers are giving their views, and people are generally accepting that the lawyers likely have a better opinion of the legal situation - whereas what you're saying above suggests their opinion shouldn't have any more weight than any other person posting, so their knowledge and expertise counts for nothing.&nbsp; I guess we can also discount what this anonymous RyanD poster has to say about what WOTC's original intentions of the licence were, and come up with our own speculations that would have as much weight.&nbsp; I fundamentally disagree with your take that people who have identified themselves as publishers, and indeed some of them have their names quite clear and distinctly identifiable and happily name what they are associated with (and so not really anonymous unless you think they are lying)- suddenly have no clout when it comes to talking about what publishers may or may not be doing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="gban007, post: 8902739, member: 56488"] Seems a bit ironic posting this in a thread where lawyers are giving their views, and people are generally accepting that the lawyers likely have a better opinion of the legal situation - whereas what you're saying above suggests their opinion shouldn't have any more weight than any other person posting, so their knowledge and expertise counts for nothing. I guess we can also discount what this anonymous RyanD poster has to say about what WOTC's original intentions of the licence were, and come up with our own speculations that would have as much weight. I fundamentally disagree with your take that people who have identified themselves as publishers, and indeed some of them have their names quite clear and distinctly identifiable and happily name what they are associated with (and so not really anonymous unless you think they are lying)- suddenly have no clout when it comes to talking about what publishers may or may not be doing. [/QUOTE]

Verification