Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Steel_Wind" data-source="post: 8906702" data-attributes="member: 20741">I edited that -- you'll note that I have changed it from what you have quoted (for the good reaosn that it is wrong!) I was fighting my computer to log back on to change that for 90 minutes!But I have now. It now reads:"It doesn't govern a license for wholly new material - and it arguably doesn't govern the release of derivative material either. On the derivative works issue, that may be subject to a new form of OGL license that WotC might choose to update and restrain or curtail... or maybe not, too. (Here, there is parol evidence to inform the court as to what the parties intended and understood the contract to mean concerning this use)."And that brings us back to what the parties said and didn't say, did and didn't do, and the acts taken (and not taken) -- especially back in 2008 in relation to PF1 = all with a view to helping the court resolve the contractual ambiguity. We've been down that road already.</blockquote>