Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 8914933" data-attributes="member: 6795602">1. Despite claims that you must publish under OGL 1.0a to become a licensee, the faq says you become a licensee upon receiving OGC.This is important due to all the people rushing to publish under OGL 1.0a.2.  The FAQ also claims that distributing under the OGL 1.0a (even for works wholly your own) makes you a licensee - implication being that WOTC is also a licensee to the OGL 1.0a.3. Taken together this strongly suggests that OGC is a shared pool of content and also that the ‘Contributors’ in the license function as a single entity instead of separate ones each licensing their content  separately under OGL 1.0a.Thus I would say that the contributors as a whole would have to withdraw the offer to license OGC.  WOTC is a licensee and is not the entity making the license offer in the OGL 1.0a.</blockquote>