Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Helm of Opposite Alignment ... Think "A Clockwork Orange"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 3659823" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>There is a good reason for that. I don't clear know what I think either, and so naturally my answer is couched in uncertainty. </p><p></p><p>It is however NOT couched in relativism. I certainly do not think all answers are equally valid. There is probably one best answer. But, I don't know what that one best answer is, and to be honest I'm not even sure I can tell a good answer from a bad one. The reason for that is somewhat complicated. I think the best way I can answer it is approach the question from a different angle. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>To be honest, I think it would kill it. I think that a forced alignment shift would be the equivalent of smashing a glass vase, melting down the peices, and reshaping it with an unloving hand to something else. I think it would be the most brutal thing I can imagine short of actually destroying a soul, and while less violent would be more cruel. I think that at the moment it happens, former you ceases to exist permenently and that you can never go back. I think you are reborn as something which would have been abhorrent to your former self, that would not be the you you were, but since you aren't your former self you love yourself as you love your own flesh. Only, terribly, your new self has been given the illusion of being another self by having the memories of the former self scrawled into it and that most terrible of all it wouldn't contain the moment where former self agreed to become new self and baby stepped its way as close as it could to that and I think that this would increase the brutality of the moment - the difference between making love and rape, between martyrdom and murder. I think you would say, "I'm not the person I was.", and you really would literally <em>not be</em> the person you were.</p><p></p><p>To the extent that I even understand what I just wrote, and frankly I don't, I'd run it like that. </p><p></p><p>But I assure you, I don't actually know what would happen and I can only guess at it. Given what I think actually happens, I'd be very skeptical of excercising that power if it was granted to me even with the intention of doing good. I'd consider it a form of execution. The only time I can even imagine its justifiable is when the life of the person is justly forfiet anyway, in which case it is probably no more cruel than the alternatives - life long imprisonment or death. </p><p></p><p>And I think society would need some special ritual for dealing with that fact that you've got the same body walking around, but a different identity. I suggest cleansing ceremonies, renaming ceremonies, mandatory entry into some form of service organization, or whatever to help society understand that change. I think that's where you think I'm being relative, but if you see the purpose behind all my suggestions you'll see that I'm just trying to communicate, and language <em>is</em> relative to the hearer. But the meaning I'm trying to convey is absolute.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 3659823, member: 4937"] There is a good reason for that. I don't clear know what I think either, and so naturally my answer is couched in uncertainty. It is however NOT couched in relativism. I certainly do not think all answers are equally valid. There is probably one best answer. But, I don't know what that one best answer is, and to be honest I'm not even sure I can tell a good answer from a bad one. The reason for that is somewhat complicated. I think the best way I can answer it is approach the question from a different angle. To be honest, I think it would kill it. I think that a forced alignment shift would be the equivalent of smashing a glass vase, melting down the peices, and reshaping it with an unloving hand to something else. I think it would be the most brutal thing I can imagine short of actually destroying a soul, and while less violent would be more cruel. I think that at the moment it happens, former you ceases to exist permenently and that you can never go back. I think you are reborn as something which would have been abhorrent to your former self, that would not be the you you were, but since you aren't your former self you love yourself as you love your own flesh. Only, terribly, your new self has been given the illusion of being another self by having the memories of the former self scrawled into it and that most terrible of all it wouldn't contain the moment where former self agreed to become new self and baby stepped its way as close as it could to that and I think that this would increase the brutality of the moment - the difference between making love and rape, between martyrdom and murder. I think you would say, "I'm not the person I was.", and you really would literally [i]not be[/i] the person you were. To the extent that I even understand what I just wrote, and frankly I don't, I'd run it like that. But I assure you, I don't actually know what would happen and I can only guess at it. Given what I think actually happens, I'd be very skeptical of excercising that power if it was granted to me even with the intention of doing good. I'd consider it a form of execution. The only time I can even imagine its justifiable is when the life of the person is justly forfiet anyway, in which case it is probably no more cruel than the alternatives - life long imprisonment or death. And I think society would need some special ritual for dealing with that fact that you've got the same body walking around, but a different identity. I suggest cleansing ceremonies, renaming ceremonies, mandatory entry into some form of service organization, or whatever to help society understand that change. I think that's where you think I'm being relative, but if you see the purpose behind all my suggestions you'll see that I'm just trying to communicate, and language [i]is[/i] relative to the hearer. But the meaning I'm trying to convey is absolute. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Helm of Opposite Alignment ... Think "A Clockwork Orange"
Top