Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Magesmiley" data-source="post: 2661337" data-attributes="member: 26292">Well, I don't actually play Eberron (nor do I own any of the books), but I do play clerics, so I will offer my advice with that caveat.My personal thought on something different: try finding a deity which grants two of the elemental domains - fire plus either earth or air. The fire domain list throws in a few nice direct damage spells, which might surprise a few people (earth and air have some decent spells as well). By selecting fire and one of the two above you can either rebuke or turn ALL elemental creatures (plus undead of course). This eventually turns into destroy and command of those same creatures (commanding said creatures about can be very handy).If you take fire as a domain, the feat that allows spontaneous domain spells (from Complete Divine, can't recall the exact name & don't have my books right now) might be fun too (burn burn burn). A chaotic good cleric who likes burning things might be a LOT of fun to play.As was mentioned before, consider the much discussed divine metamagic feat from Complete Divine. This can be a very potent combination for a cleric - I like quicken and reach myself.From the later post, you're looking at a martial cleric of some sort however. I think the strength domain is kind of a no-brainer here. Enlarge person and bull's strength as your level 1 & 2 spells domain spells (plus the str bonus for a round domain ability) kind of makes it shine. However, that said, those spells are probably better dropped on the party fighter than yourself. In general, I've found most of the buff combat spells are better applied to the party's main fighter-type rather than the cleric.On a final note, I've generally found the magic domain to be a bit on the weak side when I've selected it in the past.</blockquote>

Verification