Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Help for dealing with rogues
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 6123117" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>They way we've handled this in the past, which has become my favourite and default way, is not for everyone and doesn't work for every gamestyle, but here it is anyway...</p><p></p><p>House rule: <em>Intra-party conflict is forbidden.</em> No physically attacking another PC. No unsolicited casting of spells on another PC. No stealing from another PC. No betraying the party.</p><p></p><p>IOW, I just plain and explicitly forbid these in my games, <em>unless the players <strong>unanimously </strong>decide together that it fits with the story.</em></p><p></p><p>So if the players decide that the Rogue in facts should steal from others and should end up with more equipment, because it fits with the characters and story, then I let them do it. However, if the other PCs discover the thief and the players (once again unanimously i.e. including the Rogue player) decide to execute him or cast him away from the party because it fits the story, I let them do it.</p><p></p><p>But if at any point even <strong>one</strong> player disagrees, I enforce the house rule, and it just won't happen.</p><p></p><p>Because I just know that this leads only to trouble and even enmity between players.</p><p></p><p>//</p><p></p><p>So in your case, if everybody is fine with the idea that they all get less equipment than the Bard and the Rogue, and they like the story that these cleptomaniacs screw their friends all the time, fine for me.</p><p></p><p>If at least one of the players doesn't like this, I would overrule that the Rogue and Bard just cannot do it.</p><p></p><p>Then I make sure to tell everybody that if they get discovered, it will be once again up to them to decide if they get forgiven or not, but once again they will all need to agree. I won't let them kill the Rogue if the Rogue player doesn't want this too. They should probably know this beforehand, and think twice before deciding to let him steal in the first place.</p><p></p><p>Oh and by the way, <strong>this also applies</strong> in the case we're playing an "evil campaign" with evil PCs. I don't care if <em>some</em> players think that evil characters should screw their allies all the time, either <em>all</em> players agree, or nobody just don't ever do this! If they don't like this setup, we don't play an evil campaign at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 6123117, member: 1465"] They way we've handled this in the past, which has become my favourite and default way, is not for everyone and doesn't work for every gamestyle, but here it is anyway... House rule: [I]Intra-party conflict is forbidden.[/I] No physically attacking another PC. No unsolicited casting of spells on another PC. No stealing from another PC. No betraying the party. IOW, I just plain and explicitly forbid these in my games, [I]unless the players [B]unanimously [/B]decide together that it fits with the story.[/I] So if the players decide that the Rogue in facts should steal from others and should end up with more equipment, because it fits with the characters and story, then I let them do it. However, if the other PCs discover the thief and the players (once again unanimously i.e. including the Rogue player) decide to execute him or cast him away from the party because it fits the story, I let them do it. But if at any point even [B]one[/B] player disagrees, I enforce the house rule, and it just won't happen. Because I just know that this leads only to trouble and even enmity between players. // So in your case, if everybody is fine with the idea that they all get less equipment than the Bard and the Rogue, and they like the story that these cleptomaniacs screw their friends all the time, fine for me. If at least one of the players doesn't like this, I would overrule that the Rogue and Bard just cannot do it. Then I make sure to tell everybody that if they get discovered, it will be once again up to them to decide if they get forgiven or not, but once again they will all need to agree. I won't let them kill the Rogue if the Rogue player doesn't want this too. They should probably know this beforehand, and think twice before deciding to let him steal in the first place. Oh and by the way, [B]this also applies[/B] in the case we're playing an "evil campaign" with evil PCs. I don't care if [I]some[/I] players think that evil characters should screw their allies all the time, either [I]all[/I] players agree, or nobody just don't ever do this! If they don't like this setup, we don't play an evil campaign at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Help for dealing with rogues
Top