Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Help Making Gears of Revolution AP More Leftist?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RangerWickett" data-source="post: 8265215" data-attributes="member: 63"><p>I mean, any sort of system that focuses on one thing to the exclusion of all others will end up hurting people. It's a 'bad guy' not because it's communist, but because it's not allowing any dissent. Shortly thereafter you encounter, basically, a neoconservative hivemind built around the idea that everyone needs to 'contribute' or else be purged.</p><p></p><p>Let me ask, do you think your players would be interested in this? Are the players already politically minded? </p><p></p><p>You might want to highlight, in adventure 6, some Berans who are trying to operate an anarcho-syndicalist system, and maybe the Executore dola Liberta the party meets can be ruling on actions some business owner used to try to stop his workers from organizing. And in adventure 7, perhaps play up the Panarchists, who have a ~sorta~ compatible ideology: if we empower everyone physically, it becomes harder to force people to become subservient. Then in adventure 12, you'd want to add a couple planes that have traits that might contribute to worlds the players could consider creating. (We especially did not have enough good water or space planes.)</p><p></p><p>In the upcoming post-AP setting book, we needed a default cosmology, and I took what appeared to be consensus choices that multiple groups had chosen in their playthroughs of the AP. Then I did a couple tweaks, under the premise that the Ob managed to pose enough of a challenge in the final confrontation to stop the PCs from getting any sort of ideal utopia; instead they had to make do with some 'decent but not great' options. In the aftermath, the people of the world eventually figure out that something changed, and they have a sense of who were in charge of deciding how it changed, and so there's a concern: if the people who decided what to change had their values established by coming to power within a world that even they recognized was flawed, how much better could they really have made things?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RangerWickett, post: 8265215, member: 63"] I mean, any sort of system that focuses on one thing to the exclusion of all others will end up hurting people. It's a 'bad guy' not because it's communist, but because it's not allowing any dissent. Shortly thereafter you encounter, basically, a neoconservative hivemind built around the idea that everyone needs to 'contribute' or else be purged. Let me ask, do you think your players would be interested in this? Are the players already politically minded? You might want to highlight, in adventure 6, some Berans who are trying to operate an anarcho-syndicalist system, and maybe the Executore dola Liberta the party meets can be ruling on actions some business owner used to try to stop his workers from organizing. And in adventure 7, perhaps play up the Panarchists, who have a ~sorta~ compatible ideology: if we empower everyone physically, it becomes harder to force people to become subservient. Then in adventure 12, you'd want to add a couple planes that have traits that might contribute to worlds the players could consider creating. (We especially did not have enough good water or space planes.) In the upcoming post-AP setting book, we needed a default cosmology, and I took what appeared to be consensus choices that multiple groups had chosen in their playthroughs of the AP. Then I did a couple tweaks, under the premise that the Ob managed to pose enough of a challenge in the final confrontation to stop the PCs from getting any sort of ideal utopia; instead they had to make do with some 'decent but not great' options. In the aftermath, the people of the world eventually figure out that something changed, and they have a sense of who were in charge of deciding how it changed, and so there's a concern: if the people who decided what to change had their values established by coming to power within a world that even they recognized was flawed, how much better could they really have made things? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Help Making Gears of Revolution AP More Leftist?
Top