Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Help me convince my DM that monks aren't broken
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wyvernhand" data-source="post: 5652080" data-attributes="member: 97681"><p>Arrowhawk...you really don't understand the premise of the Tier system at all. It's not about pure power. I can build a charger fighter who can deal enough damage to under the earth. That doesn't make a fighter Tier 1, though. Just like your semi truck, its only set up to do one thing....deliver payload.</p><p></p><p>No, the tier system is a measure of potential power, access to that power, and versatility while wielding that power. The above fighter is a hammer, and its really good at pounding in nails (damage). The high tier classes are more like that Chinese shovel multitool. If yyou can't figure out how to solve your problem with one of those, you aren't thinking hard enough. It can hammer in nails too, about as good as the hammer can, too. It can also dig pits, cut wire, paddle a raft, be used as a grappling hook, saw a log, etc, etc, etc.</p><p></p><p>A high tier class can deal damage like a low tier class while still maintaining flexibility. It can also do more with less. Less gear, less focus, less optimization. I can end an encounter in one round with a charger, but it takes a careful synergy of 2 classes, 4 feats, and 3 magic items. I can do the same on a wizard by memorizing Glitterdust. Less effort, same results. Or, more effort, better results.</p><p></p><p>I can build a monk who is highly versatile and a powerful combatant. It requires a lot of work, obscure books, and carefully selected features and gear, and in the end, contains very few levels of the actual monk class. If I don't, I either get something that is strong but shallow, or I get something that is broad, but weak. I can do the same on a Druid, simply by taking Natural Spell at 6. Potential, and level of effort, that is how tiers are measured.</p><p></p><p>And yea, you were right about one thing. Spells have the highest versatility and the highest return on investment. That's why all Tier 1 and 2s are caster or pseudo-caster. The most versatile caster (Clerics, Druids, Wizards) are the highest, with the less versatile caster (Sorcerers, Psions, Beguilers, Bards, etc) being lower tiers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wyvernhand, post: 5652080, member: 97681"] Arrowhawk...you really don't understand the premise of the Tier system at all. It's not about pure power. I can build a charger fighter who can deal enough damage to under the earth. That doesn't make a fighter Tier 1, though. Just like your semi truck, its only set up to do one thing....deliver payload. No, the tier system is a measure of potential power, access to that power, and versatility while wielding that power. The above fighter is a hammer, and its really good at pounding in nails (damage). The high tier classes are more like that Chinese shovel multitool. If yyou can't figure out how to solve your problem with one of those, you aren't thinking hard enough. It can hammer in nails too, about as good as the hammer can, too. It can also dig pits, cut wire, paddle a raft, be used as a grappling hook, saw a log, etc, etc, etc. A high tier class can deal damage like a low tier class while still maintaining flexibility. It can also do more with less. Less gear, less focus, less optimization. I can end an encounter in one round with a charger, but it takes a careful synergy of 2 classes, 4 feats, and 3 magic items. I can do the same on a wizard by memorizing Glitterdust. Less effort, same results. Or, more effort, better results. I can build a monk who is highly versatile and a powerful combatant. It requires a lot of work, obscure books, and carefully selected features and gear, and in the end, contains very few levels of the actual monk class. If I don't, I either get something that is strong but shallow, or I get something that is broad, but weak. I can do the same on a Druid, simply by taking Natural Spell at 6. Potential, and level of effort, that is how tiers are measured. And yea, you were right about one thing. Spells have the highest versatility and the highest return on investment. That's why all Tier 1 and 2s are caster or pseudo-caster. The most versatile caster (Clerics, Druids, Wizards) are the highest, with the less versatile caster (Sorcerers, Psions, Beguilers, Bards, etc) being lower tiers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Help me convince my DM that monks aren't broken
Top