Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Help me define my Dwarven cultures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sword of Spirit" data-source="post: 7277804" data-attributes="member: 6677017"><p>I'm coming up with distinguishing elements of the different "subraces" of dwarves on my world, and I'm having a hard time coming up with something satisfying.</p><p></p><p>I'm using Hill Dwarves, Mountain Dwarves, and Deep Dwarves (mechanically mountain dwarves, but conceptually similar to 2e deep dwarves). I also have duergar, but their identity is pretty clear.</p><p></p><p>I want to make sure that all three subraces include the basic elements that make dwarves dwarves (gold, gods and clan, as well as tradition, mining, craftsmanship), but then each one has some sort of extra emphasis that makes it distinct and interesting.</p><p></p><p>For Hill Dwarves I'm thinking conceptually they are more connected to other races. They are more likely than other dwarves to have surface outposts, be a blacksmith in a human village, travel around in the overland world, etc. However, they still prefer their underground kingdoms and don't allow non-dwarves too deep within them.</p><p></p><p>For Deep Dwarves, they are the most isolated, and I'm thinking of perhaps having their special emphasis be history. They are the memory of the race.</p><p></p><p>For Mountain Dwarves (my favorite subrace), I'm hitting a wall. One thing I want to do is make them the fiercest warriors, and say they are less likely to interact with non-dwarves than hill dwarves. But "isolationism" doesn't make them appealing, "good at fighting" isn't really worth anything in assigning D&D identity, because it applies to almost everyone. One thing that I like is to say that they do everything bigger/grander--larger halls, more ornamentation in the artwork, more dedication in their battles against the traditional enemies of dwarves, etc.</p><p></p><p>So I might say:</p><p>Hill Dwarves: Trade and "travel"</p><p>Mountain Dwarves: Glory and grandeur</p><p>Deep Dwarves: History and Memory</p><p></p><p>But...mountain dwarves still feel off to me, as if they are being given something that isn't in the same sort of category as the other types. You go to hill dwarves when you want to buy from dwarves or otherwise talk to them. You go way into the earth to the deep dwarves when you want information on the oldest dwarven legends and accounts, or when you need access to some hidden away dwarven artifact. And you go to the mountain dwarves when...oh, you just don't. They don't want you there. Or from the DM's perspective. "Use a hill dwarf when you want them to be approachable. Use a deep dwarf when you want them to have great insight. Use a mountain dwarf when you want them to be stuck up?" It's just not working right.</p><p></p><p>Thoughts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sword of Spirit, post: 7277804, member: 6677017"] I'm coming up with distinguishing elements of the different "subraces" of dwarves on my world, and I'm having a hard time coming up with something satisfying. I'm using Hill Dwarves, Mountain Dwarves, and Deep Dwarves (mechanically mountain dwarves, but conceptually similar to 2e deep dwarves). I also have duergar, but their identity is pretty clear. I want to make sure that all three subraces include the basic elements that make dwarves dwarves (gold, gods and clan, as well as tradition, mining, craftsmanship), but then each one has some sort of extra emphasis that makes it distinct and interesting. For Hill Dwarves I'm thinking conceptually they are more connected to other races. They are more likely than other dwarves to have surface outposts, be a blacksmith in a human village, travel around in the overland world, etc. However, they still prefer their underground kingdoms and don't allow non-dwarves too deep within them. For Deep Dwarves, they are the most isolated, and I'm thinking of perhaps having their special emphasis be history. They are the memory of the race. For Mountain Dwarves (my favorite subrace), I'm hitting a wall. One thing I want to do is make them the fiercest warriors, and say they are less likely to interact with non-dwarves than hill dwarves. But "isolationism" doesn't make them appealing, "good at fighting" isn't really worth anything in assigning D&D identity, because it applies to almost everyone. One thing that I like is to say that they do everything bigger/grander--larger halls, more ornamentation in the artwork, more dedication in their battles against the traditional enemies of dwarves, etc. So I might say: Hill Dwarves: Trade and "travel" Mountain Dwarves: Glory and grandeur Deep Dwarves: History and Memory But...mountain dwarves still feel off to me, as if they are being given something that isn't in the same sort of category as the other types. You go to hill dwarves when you want to buy from dwarves or otherwise talk to them. You go way into the earth to the deep dwarves when you want information on the oldest dwarven legends and accounts, or when you need access to some hidden away dwarven artifact. And you go to the mountain dwarves when...oh, you just don't. They don't want you there. Or from the DM's perspective. "Use a hill dwarf when you want them to be approachable. Use a deep dwarf when you want them to have great insight. Use a mountain dwarf when you want them to be stuck up?" It's just not working right. Thoughts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Help me define my Dwarven cultures
Top