Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="(Psi)SeveredHead" data-source="post: 733162" data-attributes="member: 1165">I could do that in 2e. All I needed was a dwarven hammer, girdle of storm giant strength, and gauntlets of ogre power - which stacked with each other! Or take a moonaxe (1d12 dmg) and Grand Mastery, increasing it's dice size by one - to 1d20! Or I could specialize in shield and armor, getting an AC of around -1 at 1st-level,with a Dex of 14 (no bonuses).I remember the weird unbalanced XP tables, especially the druid. The low XP for "thieves" implied that they sucked - which they did (IMO). Modules should have had XP requirements, rather than level suggestions.The question mark is right. I think some of the 2e stuff wasn't tested properly.Out where?If you say so.Those were so stupid! They could just cap elves at 20th-level. To see if I have this straight: elves were the best wizards. They taught magic to humans. Why couldn't elven wizards exceed 15th-level? Did they suddenly suffer "XP block"?See point #7. I've seen characters do 17 attacks over 2 rounds with a longbow. I don't even want to know how he did it.</blockquote>