Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sylrae" data-source="post: 5276009" data-attributes="member: 48520">I can sortof see that. Paladin only got the antipaladin, and IMO new domains are not the same as new archetypes. YMMV.Not to mention, the subdomains are basically just new or variant domains, and I can't find a reason to justify not giving them to anyone with domain access, beyond the fact that clerics didn't get anything that actually made sense to be unique to them in the APG.Plus, for non-golarion games, many of those subdomains make more sense being their own domains. Some of them were pathfinder treatments of what WERE FR Domains IIRC.It would have been nice if the wizard included a priest variant that casted divine cleric spells like a cleric but was mostly wizard like in other aspects, possibly with 3 domains and 2 domain slots per level, or 3 domains and the ability to put domain spells in regular slots.a battle wizard/sorcerer variant would have been nice as well. as a cleric/ranger variant that used wizard spells and cast like a wizard with some kind of restrictions to stop it from being better than the regular wizard.</blockquote>