Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Help me nail down this 'take 10, take 20' nonsense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Patryn of Elvenshae" data-source="post: 1832612" data-attributes="member: 23094"><p>Knifespeaks asked:</p><p></p><p></p><p>That's actually a really, really good question, and I'm glad you asked it.</p><p></p><p>To start off with, you have two choices regarding how difficult to find the door really is:</p><p></p><p>1. Anyone with a Search skill of 0 will be able to find the door given enough time. In this case, the Search DC of the door must be exactly 20. Note that this does not prevent the character from finding the door on his or her quick once-over, as a 20 could still be rolled.</p><p></p><p>2. Anyone with a Search skill of 0 won't be able to find the door given enough time, but will with enough information. In this case, you may set the DC higher, so long as you provide a chance to "earn" an appropriate Circumstance modifier (the DM's friend). For instance, when it comes to a DC 24 secret door, a character with a Search modifier of +0 will never, ever find it. However, should they find the Necromancer's journal, which luckily includes a quick diagram of the doorway, they recieve a +4 Circumstance bonus on Search checks when looking for that particular door. Now, the +0 person can find the door while taking 20, since he's got the clues.</p><p></p><p>We'll assume, for purposes of east, that you choose the 1st option. It's possible for a non-Search focused person to find the door if they are lucky. The next part of your problem is the ability to Take 20. There are actually quite a few ways to work around something like this.</p><p></p><p>1. Enforce time limits. "Taking 20" on a search check allows you to check exactly *1* 5' by 5' square. This will take a single character two minutes to do. A fairly standard 30' by 30' room, then, is made up of 36 5' x 5' squares. Thus, it'll take a single searching character more than an hour to search the whole room, or 40 minutes just to search the walls. After 40 minutes of searching, most of your party's spells will have worn out, you'll have burned through a couple torches, and any intelligent enemies in your area will have prepared at least a makeshift barricade. These are entirely separate from other, more difficult time considerations - perhaps the princess will be sacrificed at midnight, so you don't have time to waste checking every square foot of floor space for secret doors.</p><p></p><p>2. Make the door easy to find but hard to open. Finding the door, in this case, is only half of the problem, since you still need to get the darned thing open. Maybe there's a hidden lever (harder to find), or a secret phrase or password that needs to be spoken, that causes the 2' thick stone door to swing open. Perhaps the lever is actually located inside a nearby pit trap, or in the ceiling.</p><p></p><p>The real question, however, is why the bad guy is designing such lousy secret doors. After all, if any fool off the street (+0 Search bonus) can find it given enough time, then any reasonably-trained individual will find it almost without effort. For instance, an Elven Rogue 2 who's trained himself to find hidden things (Search +5 ranks, Int +2, Racial bonus +2, Skill Focus (Search) +3, <strong>TOTAL: +12</strong>) will probably find it just by walking past it.</p><p></p><p>In other words, if want to keep people out of your secret rooms, a DC 20 door isn't going to accomplish much.</p><p></p><p>EDIT:</p><p></p><p>As Scion, said, above. The problem is that you think a DC 20 secret door should be hard to find.</p><p></p><p>It isn't.</p><p></p><p>In fact, a standard camoflauged *pit trap* has a standard Search DC of 24.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Patryn of Elvenshae, post: 1832612, member: 23094"] Knifespeaks asked: That's actually a really, really good question, and I'm glad you asked it. To start off with, you have two choices regarding how difficult to find the door really is: 1. Anyone with a Search skill of 0 will be able to find the door given enough time. In this case, the Search DC of the door must be exactly 20. Note that this does not prevent the character from finding the door on his or her quick once-over, as a 20 could still be rolled. 2. Anyone with a Search skill of 0 won't be able to find the door given enough time, but will with enough information. In this case, you may set the DC higher, so long as you provide a chance to "earn" an appropriate Circumstance modifier (the DM's friend). For instance, when it comes to a DC 24 secret door, a character with a Search modifier of +0 will never, ever find it. However, should they find the Necromancer's journal, which luckily includes a quick diagram of the doorway, they recieve a +4 Circumstance bonus on Search checks when looking for that particular door. Now, the +0 person can find the door while taking 20, since he's got the clues. We'll assume, for purposes of east, that you choose the 1st option. It's possible for a non-Search focused person to find the door if they are lucky. The next part of your problem is the ability to Take 20. There are actually quite a few ways to work around something like this. 1. Enforce time limits. "Taking 20" on a search check allows you to check exactly *1* 5' by 5' square. This will take a single character two minutes to do. A fairly standard 30' by 30' room, then, is made up of 36 5' x 5' squares. Thus, it'll take a single searching character more than an hour to search the whole room, or 40 minutes just to search the walls. After 40 minutes of searching, most of your party's spells will have worn out, you'll have burned through a couple torches, and any intelligent enemies in your area will have prepared at least a makeshift barricade. These are entirely separate from other, more difficult time considerations - perhaps the princess will be sacrificed at midnight, so you don't have time to waste checking every square foot of floor space for secret doors. 2. Make the door easy to find but hard to open. Finding the door, in this case, is only half of the problem, since you still need to get the darned thing open. Maybe there's a hidden lever (harder to find), or a secret phrase or password that needs to be spoken, that causes the 2' thick stone door to swing open. Perhaps the lever is actually located inside a nearby pit trap, or in the ceiling. The real question, however, is why the bad guy is designing such lousy secret doors. After all, if any fool off the street (+0 Search bonus) can find it given enough time, then any reasonably-trained individual will find it almost without effort. For instance, an Elven Rogue 2 who's trained himself to find hidden things (Search +5 ranks, Int +2, Racial bonus +2, Skill Focus (Search) +3, [b]TOTAL: +12[/b]) will probably find it just by walking past it. In other words, if want to keep people out of your secret rooms, a DC 20 door isn't going to accomplish much. EDIT: As Scion, said, above. The problem is that you think a DC 20 secret door should be hard to find. It isn't. In fact, a standard camoflauged *pit trap* has a standard Search DC of 24. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Help me nail down this 'take 10, take 20' nonsense
Top