Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="StreamOfTheSky" data-source="post: 5241525" data-attributes="member: 35909">Why does the PF Druid need nerfing?&nbsp; Seems like it got nerfed rather badly while the Cleric and Wizard gained power, at least in terms of class abilities.&nbsp; Of course, the spell nerfings presumably more than made up for those boosts, since ultimately, it was being full casters and prepared spellcasters that made them so powerful above all else.&nbsp; So, assuming the spell lists were nerfed equally, why on earth would the Druid need more nerfing over the other two?&nbsp; They were basically all equal in 3.5 (and non core allowed, Sorc joined their ranks).Is it because PF thus far is sparse on prestige classes, and while Druid 20 gave interesting stuff aside from spells, a &quot;Wizard 20&quot; or &quot;Cleric 20&quot; in play seldom had more than 5 levels in the actual base class?(I go with the opinion that it's hatred through lack of understanding or dislike of how &quot;different&quot; the class is from other spellcasters.&nbsp; The same reason, to a less extreme degree, that causes you to occasionally get some moron who thinks the monk is overpowered because they get all these mystical supernatural abilities unlike anything a Fighter gets.)Oh, also...Fun With Editing!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="StreamOfTheSky, post: 5241525, member: 35909"] Why does the PF Druid need nerfing? Seems like it got nerfed rather badly while the Cleric and Wizard [i]gained[/i] power, at least in terms of class abilities. Of course, the spell nerfings presumably more than made up for those boosts, since ultimately, it was being full casters and prepared spellcasters that made them so powerful above all else. So, assuming the spell lists were nerfed equally, why on earth would the Druid need more nerfing over the other two? They were basically all equal in 3.5 (and non core allowed, Sorc joined their ranks). Is it because PF thus far is sparse on prestige classes, and while Druid 20 gave interesting stuff aside from spells, a "Wizard 20" or "Cleric 20" in play seldom had more than 5 levels in the actual base class? (I go with the opinion that it's hatred through lack of understanding or dislike of how "different" the class is from other spellcasters. The same reason, to a less extreme degree, that causes you to occasionally get some moron who thinks the monk is overpowered because they get all these mystical supernatural abilities unlike anything a Fighter gets.) Oh, also...Fun With Editing! [/QUOTE]

Verification