Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Help Me Reverse-Engineer 5e DCs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fanaelialae" data-source="post: 5818406" data-attributes="member: 53980"><p>It may not be as clunky as it seems at first glance. If the DCs are listed as </p><p></p><p>DC 18/14 </p><p>(18 to auto succeed, 14 if rolled)</p><p></p><p>it wouldn't be the most streamlined mechanic in history, but I certainly wouldn't call it clunky. I don't think it'll be exactly that though, because they could have addressed that more simply with a Take 10 rule. Folks have referred to this as a Take Attribute rule, so it must be something different.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Perhaps it is simply a single DC, implying a curve with regard to how stats scale.</p><p></p><p>So DC 18 would auto succeed with Str 18, but require a check of 18 if Str is 17 or lower. In this way, someone with Str 18 is significantly stronger than someone with Str 16 (because Str 18 succeeds 100% where Str 16 only succeeds 30%). The gap between Str 12 and 10 would be much smaller (because while Str 12 succeeds 100% on DC 12, Str 10 succeeds 45%). Hence, the curve in power.</p><p></p><p></p><p>In all truth though, I don't think there's enough information for us to do more than guess at this stage. Everyone who does know is under an NDA, and therefore can't say. The rest of us don't even know if we're barking up the right tree. They could have made the attribute/ modifier relationship anything, for all we know.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fanaelialae, post: 5818406, member: 53980"] It may not be as clunky as it seems at first glance. If the DCs are listed as DC 18/14 (18 to auto succeed, 14 if rolled) it wouldn't be the most streamlined mechanic in history, but I certainly wouldn't call it clunky. I don't think it'll be exactly that though, because they could have addressed that more simply with a Take 10 rule. Folks have referred to this as a Take Attribute rule, so it must be something different. Perhaps it is simply a single DC, implying a curve with regard to how stats scale. So DC 18 would auto succeed with Str 18, but require a check of 18 if Str is 17 or lower. In this way, someone with Str 18 is significantly stronger than someone with Str 16 (because Str 18 succeeds 100% where Str 16 only succeeds 30%). The gap between Str 12 and 10 would be much smaller (because while Str 12 succeeds 100% on DC 12, Str 10 succeeds 45%). Hence, the curve in power. In all truth though, I don't think there's enough information for us to do more than guess at this stage. Everyone who does know is under an NDA, and therefore can't say. The rest of us don't even know if we're barking up the right tree. They could have made the attribute/ modifier relationship anything, for all we know. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Help Me Reverse-Engineer 5e DCs
Top