Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="BobTheNob" data-source="post: 5372288" data-attributes="member: 82425">The OP didnt raise points in a "flaming" manner, so I will respect his tone in my response <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I did find it funny the reponse to the need for the tactical board. Thats the one thing of 4e that I think made it shine above previous versions. We have always had that there are ways to dominate encounters : bigger hitting attacks, better spells, more potents heals, pets. With 4e's tacitcal layout they brought a new dimension...Strategy!A whole new aspect to how you can contribute to success. Sure, my warlord doesnt hit that hard, and he wont keep up with Larry the cleric for heals, nor will he incinerate that bunsh of hobgoblins behing the barricade over there. But then you have this horrible situation where everyo0nes in the worng place and flanked, my warlord does what he does and re-positions the battlefield!I never saw tactical positioning as a crutch for 4e...I saw it as a chance for players to do things right.</blockquote>