Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Help me understand & find the fun in OC/neo-trad play...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zakael19" data-source="post: 9357950" data-attributes="member: 7044099"><p>So separating out "OC" style play, which in my experience gets pretty precious and can often lead to main character syndrome in a party that's not all there to play around with OCs, reading the (really freaking excellent) <em>Fabula Ultima</em> game book + GM's guide I think gets to a lot of the a) fun in "neotrad" or whatever you want to call it [I think that the keeping of traditional style leveling + classes + skills + frequent and somewhat tactical battles is what separates neotrad from the more narrativist games - [USER=70468]@kenada[/USER] provided a definition somewhere which boiled down to 'neotrad is a trad game using indie/story game techniques and systems'] and b) ways to run it.</p><p></p><p>On a) it makes it clear to all the players that everybody at the table must be as invested in moment to moment gameplay as the GM. Because players are steering the goals, they must agree to do so - accepting premise + world + risk. The world itself is co-generated during setup, and further defined in relation to the player's class and feature choices. You see <em>Daggerheart</em> doing something very similar in its playtest. It puts limits on the GM, while inculcating techniques and game rules to maximize drama within scenes through mechanically tied bonds/identities/themes. It also makes it clear that the game is in service to a narrative arc that will be created via play, based on some starting conditions. Plot will happen, it's just not pre-designed beyond villains. Eg: "Metichor, Arch-Magus of Death is working on a ritual that will drain all life from the land. How will you stop him?" and the rest of the game is the players figuring that out - racing a clock (literal, it's using FITD clocks to indicate progress/threat).</p><p></p><p>I think most neotrad games will try and incorporate consequences to failure that avoid PC death. <em>Fabula Ultima</em> explicitly says that PCs don't die at 0 hp unless they consent, they surrender instead. However, surrendering has permanent consequences - the bad guy's plans tick forward, the PC's bonds change to a darker place (and you invoke your bonds for mechanical advantage...), etc. So in many ways you've got a much richer outcome then a trad game, from a narrative/story perspective. People evolve from failure or success or setback, and then this ties back to mechanical uses. Finally, players accumulate metacurrency they can spend to invoke their bonds, change a scene (within bounds), and some other stuff.</p><p></p><p>On b) you get a set of principles and effective guidance via words and mechanics to implement them, a lot of it around seeking input from the players while being clear with them in terms of information + consequences. It's a bit long to type it all out, but I'll say that between the DM chapter in the play guide and the short GM's Guide, it contains probably some of the best GMing advice for this sort of game I've seen anywhere - presented in a manner that supplements the 4e DMG in my head as best game-running advice (towards narrative outcomes).</p><p></p><p>The Core GM principles espoused there are: </p><p>-Portray a Wonderous World (nothing new here, just make things unique but don't get bogged down in details - be short and then let players ask questions)</p><p>-Manage information. (usual stuff, you're going to be managing the info about teh world and people)</p><p>-Seek input. If class/identity relevant, ask for player input on teh fiction and game world.</p><p>-React to heroes' choice. (yeah, but does explicitly note <em>apply consequences of their freely chosen strategies and don't pull punches)</em></p><p><em>-</em>Enforce transparency. Very narrativist, make sure people understand what's at stake before they make a Check/choose courses of actions.</p><p>-Keep the pressure high. (PCs want to do things, somebody will want to stop them, there's not enough time, make some hard choices, use public facing clocks)</p><p>-Think cinematically. Lots of video game framing reference here. I find myself doing this as shorthand in some of my 5e games too anyway - we're all younger gamers.</p><p>-Start and End Scenes. Hard scene framing with close-scene resolution. Once things are petering out, ask if it's done and if no players have anything they want to do - move on. </p><p>-Design interesting battles. No filler fights, no room by room dungeon crawls. Be intense and dramatic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zakael19, post: 9357950, member: 7044099"] So separating out "OC" style play, which in my experience gets pretty precious and can often lead to main character syndrome in a party that's not all there to play around with OCs, reading the (really freaking excellent) [I]Fabula Ultima[/I] game book + GM's guide I think gets to a lot of the a) fun in "neotrad" or whatever you want to call it [I think that the keeping of traditional style leveling + classes + skills + frequent and somewhat tactical battles is what separates neotrad from the more narrativist games - [USER=70468]@kenada[/USER] provided a definition somewhere which boiled down to 'neotrad is a trad game using indie/story game techniques and systems'] and b) ways to run it. On a) it makes it clear to all the players that everybody at the table must be as invested in moment to moment gameplay as the GM. Because players are steering the goals, they must agree to do so - accepting premise + world + risk. The world itself is co-generated during setup, and further defined in relation to the player's class and feature choices. You see [I]Daggerheart[/I] doing something very similar in its playtest. It puts limits on the GM, while inculcating techniques and game rules to maximize drama within scenes through mechanically tied bonds/identities/themes. It also makes it clear that the game is in service to a narrative arc that will be created via play, based on some starting conditions. Plot will happen, it's just not pre-designed beyond villains. Eg: "Metichor, Arch-Magus of Death is working on a ritual that will drain all life from the land. How will you stop him?" and the rest of the game is the players figuring that out - racing a clock (literal, it's using FITD clocks to indicate progress/threat). I think most neotrad games will try and incorporate consequences to failure that avoid PC death. [I]Fabula Ultima[/I] explicitly says that PCs don't die at 0 hp unless they consent, they surrender instead. However, surrendering has permanent consequences - the bad guy's plans tick forward, the PC's bonds change to a darker place (and you invoke your bonds for mechanical advantage...), etc. So in many ways you've got a much richer outcome then a trad game, from a narrative/story perspective. People evolve from failure or success or setback, and then this ties back to mechanical uses. Finally, players accumulate metacurrency they can spend to invoke their bonds, change a scene (within bounds), and some other stuff. On b) you get a set of principles and effective guidance via words and mechanics to implement them, a lot of it around seeking input from the players while being clear with them in terms of information + consequences. It's a bit long to type it all out, but I'll say that between the DM chapter in the play guide and the short GM's Guide, it contains probably some of the best GMing advice for this sort of game I've seen anywhere - presented in a manner that supplements the 4e DMG in my head as best game-running advice (towards narrative outcomes). The Core GM principles espoused there are: -Portray a Wonderous World (nothing new here, just make things unique but don't get bogged down in details - be short and then let players ask questions) -Manage information. (usual stuff, you're going to be managing the info about teh world and people) -Seek input. If class/identity relevant, ask for player input on teh fiction and game world. -React to heroes' choice. (yeah, but does explicitly note [I]apply consequences of their freely chosen strategies and don't pull punches) -[/I]Enforce transparency. Very narrativist, make sure people understand what's at stake before they make a Check/choose courses of actions. -Keep the pressure high. (PCs want to do things, somebody will want to stop them, there's not enough time, make some hard choices, use public facing clocks) -Think cinematically. Lots of video game framing reference here. I find myself doing this as shorthand in some of my 5e games too anyway - we're all younger gamers. -Start and End Scenes. Hard scene framing with close-scene resolution. Once things are petering out, ask if it's done and if no players have anything they want to do - move on. -Design interesting battles. No filler fights, no room by room dungeon crawls. Be intense and dramatic. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Help me understand & find the fun in OC/neo-trad play...
Top