Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Help Me Understand the GURPS Design Perspective
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aramis erak" data-source="post: 7839985" data-attributes="member: 6779310"><p>GURPS was originally aiming to be a detailed simulation; 1 point represented (IIRC) 250 hours of study/training in a feature.</p><p></p><p>The fundamental design elements are, at least by the 1E designers notes, were the low attribute count, high melee realism, buy the cause (rather than the effect), skill difficulties varied by difficulty of learning the skill in the setting, bell curve, and boardgamable combat.</p><p></p><p>Somewhere along the line after 1E and before 3E, the variability of skill difficulty by setting went the way of the dodo...</p><p></p><p>The buy the cause element isn't called out in the designers notes directly, but the correspondence to specific training times is, and when psionics were added in G:Horror, you bought the power, then the skill or skills to use it. Likewise, the magic system is a lot of fiddlingly narrow spells with lots of prerequisites. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I've seen it happen a fair number of times. Usually with players new to point buy and used to niche protections.</p><p></p><p> Like Danny, I fully disagree with this</p><p></p><p></p><p>I disagree on both counts here. point buy is about the only sane way to let players create the types of characters they want in a system with as many options as GURPS has.</p><p></p><p>I also disagree that GURPS is all that free form, but that's just another quibble</p><p></p><p></p><p>I find exactly the opposite to be true... it's the novices who build specialists... catch them storywise a couple times with the wrong character having to do something, and it gets a very different player reaction next set of Char Gen.</p><p></p><p>GURPS is less fit for turning players loose autonomously to do CGen than Hero, in part because it doesn't have the GM and group generate the limits first. Hero makes that a core element of the campaign: Defining the limits. There's even a nifty form for it.</p><p></p><p>Many hero fans (including myself) like hero for doing things more sanely than GURPS. It is buy the effect, which makes the balance actually happen, it calls out in the rules where optimizations are easily done, it uses campaign limits to help establish feel, and it fully endorses the concept that PC's ARE better than normals.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aramis erak, post: 7839985, member: 6779310"] GURPS was originally aiming to be a detailed simulation; 1 point represented (IIRC) 250 hours of study/training in a feature. The fundamental design elements are, at least by the 1E designers notes, were the low attribute count, high melee realism, buy the cause (rather than the effect), skill difficulties varied by difficulty of learning the skill in the setting, bell curve, and boardgamable combat. Somewhere along the line after 1E and before 3E, the variability of skill difficulty by setting went the way of the dodo... The buy the cause element isn't called out in the designers notes directly, but the correspondence to specific training times is, and when psionics were added in G:Horror, you bought the power, then the skill or skills to use it. Likewise, the magic system is a lot of fiddlingly narrow spells with lots of prerequisites. I've seen it happen a fair number of times. Usually with players new to point buy and used to niche protections. Like Danny, I fully disagree with this I disagree on both counts here. point buy is about the only sane way to let players create the types of characters they want in a system with as many options as GURPS has. I also disagree that GURPS is all that free form, but that's just another quibble I find exactly the opposite to be true... it's the novices who build specialists... catch them storywise a couple times with the wrong character having to do something, and it gets a very different player reaction next set of Char Gen. GURPS is less fit for turning players loose autonomously to do CGen than Hero, in part because it doesn't have the GM and group generate the limits first. Hero makes that a core element of the campaign: Defining the limits. There's even a nifty form for it. Many hero fans (including myself) like hero for doing things more sanely than GURPS. It is buy the effect, which makes the balance actually happen, it calls out in the rules where optimizations are easily done, it uses campaign limits to help establish feel, and it fully endorses the concept that PC's ARE better than normals. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Help Me Understand the GURPS Design Perspective
Top