Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Help, Military/Vehicle Geeks!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dana_Jorgensen" data-source="post: 1101327" data-attributes="member: 12962"><p>The Glomar Explorer cost an ungodly amount that a government could afford, but not a business. Even though Howard Hughes built it, he certainly didn't pay for it (what, a rich person spend his own money when he can spend someone else's?) Only one was built. IIRC, it cost either $100 million or $1 billion to build, and while the cover story was that it was to explore mineral deposits on the ocean floor, its sole purpose was to procure a sunken soviet nuclear sub, complete with its complement of nuclear-tipped missiles. The bottom of the ship's hull opened to lower an immanse rack of clawed brackets, which were then lowered over a mile into the water to scoop yo the sub and part of the sea floor. The sea floor quickly crumbled away, leaving the sub in a cage-like structure to haul it to the surface. Unfortunately, the claw wasn't strong enough to support the sub and several beams buckled, causing the dead sub to break in half, with much of it falling back to the sea floor. A small portion of the sub was recovered as well as several of its dead crew members who received a burial at sea. The Glomar Explorer could not be repaired at sea, so it returned to dry dock. While in dry dock for repairs to its submarine lifter, a reporter broke the story that the Glomar Explorer was not a scientific research vessel, but a CIA spy ship for stealing soviet submarines out of the water. After that, repairs were never completed, and the Glomar Explorer was eventually scrapped without ever completing its original mission.</p><p></p><p>Getting rid of the ship was quite unfortunate. Had it been repaired, or better yet modified/upgraded, the government could have easily recovered construction costs by hiring it out as a submarine recovery vessel used to recover not only sunken subs for other nations, but smaller sunken surface vessels as well. The idea never struck me as so complicated that the ship required an american crew. I think a foreign crew could have easily been trained to operate it.</p><p></p><p>The Glomar Explorer is covered repeatedly in a number of documentaries shown on the history channel/tlc/discovery channel cable networks. These documentaries are ones that either focus on submarines, the history of submarine warfare, or the cold war, rather than being specifically dedicated to the ship itself.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dana_Jorgensen, post: 1101327, member: 12962"] The Glomar Explorer cost an ungodly amount that a government could afford, but not a business. Even though Howard Hughes built it, he certainly didn't pay for it (what, a rich person spend his own money when he can spend someone else's?) Only one was built. IIRC, it cost either $100 million or $1 billion to build, and while the cover story was that it was to explore mineral deposits on the ocean floor, its sole purpose was to procure a sunken soviet nuclear sub, complete with its complement of nuclear-tipped missiles. The bottom of the ship's hull opened to lower an immanse rack of clawed brackets, which were then lowered over a mile into the water to scoop yo the sub and part of the sea floor. The sea floor quickly crumbled away, leaving the sub in a cage-like structure to haul it to the surface. Unfortunately, the claw wasn't strong enough to support the sub and several beams buckled, causing the dead sub to break in half, with much of it falling back to the sea floor. A small portion of the sub was recovered as well as several of its dead crew members who received a burial at sea. The Glomar Explorer could not be repaired at sea, so it returned to dry dock. While in dry dock for repairs to its submarine lifter, a reporter broke the story that the Glomar Explorer was not a scientific research vessel, but a CIA spy ship for stealing soviet submarines out of the water. After that, repairs were never completed, and the Glomar Explorer was eventually scrapped without ever completing its original mission. Getting rid of the ship was quite unfortunate. Had it been repaired, or better yet modified/upgraded, the government could have easily recovered construction costs by hiring it out as a submarine recovery vessel used to recover not only sunken subs for other nations, but smaller sunken surface vessels as well. The idea never struck me as so complicated that the ship required an american crew. I think a foreign crew could have easily been trained to operate it. The Glomar Explorer is covered repeatedly in a number of documentaries shown on the history channel/tlc/discovery channel cable networks. These documentaries are ones that either focus on submarines, the history of submarine warfare, or the cold war, rather than being specifically dedicated to the ship itself. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Help, Military/Vehicle Geeks!
Top