Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Help with a new spell -- MY PLAYERS OUT!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gustave Arcanus" data-source="post: 1740154" data-attributes="member: 23375"><p>I happen to have an OLD Dragon (AD&D old) which describes tuning an existing spell's attributes and what level it should be, plus personal experience with fine-tuning spells.</p><p> </p><p> Let's begin. *hands everyone popcorn*</p><p> </p><p> Rusting Grasp starts as a 4th-level Druid spell. To make that available for Sorcerers and Wizards, add a level, making it 5th. It also affects a specific material (much like Rusting Grasp, it only works on non-magical ferrous metals), keeping it much the same.</p><p> </p><p> Big difference comes from the range increase. Making it a 20' radius instead of touch would push it up two levels, making it Drd 6, Sor/Wiz 7. Adding the expensive component, be it a treated rust monster tentacle or a treated version of the material itself (which is what I would bend towards) would lower it by a level if it were 100 gp per spell level. So, it would need to be 600 gp worth to be valid. As a focus, that would push it up into the 3,000-6,000 gp range. So now we're sitting at Drd 5, Sor/Wiz 6.</p><p> </p><p> Since the area remains constant, and is reasonable, that's not a change either way. Allowing a save isn't required since it won't affect magic items, though it would drop the level since Rusting Grasp doesn't allow one, nor SR. Allowing a negating save (since there is no half effect, really) would drop it one level. Though personally, I'd make it work against magic items with a negating save (Fort), and not allow a save for non-magical items, which would keep it at Drd 5, Sor/Wiz 6.</p><p> </p><p> So, we're sitting with...</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> That should be appropriate, given what it does. And of course, the material component or the focus would be interchangable. If you don't have a focus, you'll have to use the sample, and if you have the statuette, you wouldn't need anything else. Unless, of course, the statuette is mythril and you want to rip steel to shreds. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gustave Arcanus, post: 1740154, member: 23375"] I happen to have an OLD Dragon (AD&D old) which describes tuning an existing spell's attributes and what level it should be, plus personal experience with fine-tuning spells. Let's begin. *hands everyone popcorn* Rusting Grasp starts as a 4th-level Druid spell. To make that available for Sorcerers and Wizards, add a level, making it 5th. It also affects a specific material (much like Rusting Grasp, it only works on non-magical ferrous metals), keeping it much the same. Big difference comes from the range increase. Making it a 20' radius instead of touch would push it up two levels, making it Drd 6, Sor/Wiz 7. Adding the expensive component, be it a treated rust monster tentacle or a treated version of the material itself (which is what I would bend towards) would lower it by a level if it were 100 gp per spell level. So, it would need to be 600 gp worth to be valid. As a focus, that would push it up into the 3,000-6,000 gp range. So now we're sitting at Drd 5, Sor/Wiz 6. Since the area remains constant, and is reasonable, that's not a change either way. Allowing a save isn't required since it won't affect magic items, though it would drop the level since Rusting Grasp doesn't allow one, nor SR. Allowing a negating save (since there is no half effect, really) would drop it one level. Though personally, I'd make it work against magic items with a negating save (Fort), and not allow a save for non-magical items, which would keep it at Drd 5, Sor/Wiz 6. So, we're sitting with... That should be appropriate, given what it does. And of course, the material component or the focus would be interchangable. If you don't have a focus, you'll have to use the sample, and if you have the statuette, you wouldn't need anything else. Unless, of course, the statuette is mythril and you want to rip steel to shreds. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Help with a new spell -- MY PLAYERS OUT!
Top