Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Help with Alignment Bookkeeping
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tiberius" data-source="post: 239606" data-attributes="member: 1376"><p>Hmmm.... that would make (roughly) 25 units of good from coordinates (x,50) to (x,25), 50 units of neutrality from (x,24) to (x,-24), and 25 units of evil from (x,-25) to (x,-50). That is, IMO, too much neutrality. Walking the path of neutrality is exceedingly difficult, as it is tricky to balance the acts of good and evil or law and chaos. If I were using a grid system like this, I would give the poles 37 or 38 grid sections apiece (since 75/2 is 37.5) and give the remainder to neutrality.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is where it gets tricky. 5 points seems a bit low for the murder of an innocent As you say, it would take five such murders to go from being a paragon of good to borderline neutrality. I don't see how someone who has murdered four innocent people could be considered good. It would take an additional 10 murders (15 in all) to become borderline evil. I would make the murder of an innocent worth something on the order of 45-50 points. Thus, on either your scale or the one I mentioned above, murdering one innocent would drop anyone into neutrality at the very least, and two would certainly make them evil.</p><p></p><p>I would also make the shifts toward evil greater than the corresponding shifts towards good. The aforementioned murder of an innocent might be worth, say, 50 steps towards evil, while saving an innocent life might be worth 10-20 steps towards good. IMO, one must REALLY work at being good, whereas slipping into evil is easy and requires little effort.</p><p></p><p>As for other penalites/boni, you need to take the characters' motivations into account. Stealing the mayor's silverware for personal gain would be both chaotic and evil, since the gain comes at the expense of another in violation of the laws. Stealing a Book of Vile Darkness from the local Hextorian temple in order to help end a devastating war might well be a lawful and good act, as you are acting to reduce chaos and suffering. In the end, matters of alignment are entirely subjective and resist codification for easy graphing.</p><p></p><p>-Tiberius</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tiberius, post: 239606, member: 1376"] Hmmm.... that would make (roughly) 25 units of good from coordinates (x,50) to (x,25), 50 units of neutrality from (x,24) to (x,-24), and 25 units of evil from (x,-25) to (x,-50). That is, IMO, too much neutrality. Walking the path of neutrality is exceedingly difficult, as it is tricky to balance the acts of good and evil or law and chaos. If I were using a grid system like this, I would give the poles 37 or 38 grid sections apiece (since 75/2 is 37.5) and give the remainder to neutrality. This is where it gets tricky. 5 points seems a bit low for the murder of an innocent As you say, it would take five such murders to go from being a paragon of good to borderline neutrality. I don't see how someone who has murdered four innocent people could be considered good. It would take an additional 10 murders (15 in all) to become borderline evil. I would make the murder of an innocent worth something on the order of 45-50 points. Thus, on either your scale or the one I mentioned above, murdering one innocent would drop anyone into neutrality at the very least, and two would certainly make them evil. I would also make the shifts toward evil greater than the corresponding shifts towards good. The aforementioned murder of an innocent might be worth, say, 50 steps towards evil, while saving an innocent life might be worth 10-20 steps towards good. IMO, one must REALLY work at being good, whereas slipping into evil is easy and requires little effort. As for other penalites/boni, you need to take the characters' motivations into account. Stealing the mayor's silverware for personal gain would be both chaotic and evil, since the gain comes at the expense of another in violation of the laws. Stealing a Book of Vile Darkness from the local Hextorian temple in order to help end a devastating war might well be a lawful and good act, as you are acting to reduce chaos and suffering. In the end, matters of alignment are entirely subjective and resist codification for easy graphing. -Tiberius [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Help with Alignment Bookkeeping
Top