Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Glitchezz" data-source="post: 7252161" data-attributes="member: 6913845">I'm not worried about &quot;very long turn for a player&quot; because we have multiple dice sets so i can just roll for all attacks at once (if the target is still at full hp). While your build looks very good and interesting it still has too much casting for my liking (for this particular campaign), but i will surely play something like this in the future.I don't think we'll be able to get above 20 with asi. So you're saying that i should go STR based for melee or DEX for ranged, seems no one really uses dual wielding for power gaming. Fighter/Ranger/Rogue combo seems nice and doesn't have spellcasting (as i want it for this character), but what about having 20 Fighter and 10/10 Rogue/Ranger? Would that really weaken the build? Or is 20/20 really the way to go?I don't really want a character that spends everything in 1st round then be kinda useless, i'd like a great 1st round with pretty decent DPR after that. (Maybe like 1st round assassinate and get all the crits in but then i still have sneak attack and colossus slayer or similar things for the rounds after, on top of all the extra attacks)This could work nicely too! Well at first i was thinking about DEX and CON based Fighter with dual wielding but it seems dual wielding has lower damage output than 2h weapons or crossbows. My initial plan was 20 Fighter Battlemaster then 5 Rogue Assassin/Ranger Hunter/ Barbarian Bear totem/ Monk (not sure which one but Drunk master would be nice).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Glitchezz, post: 7252161, member: 6913845"] I'm not worried about "very long turn for a player" because we have multiple dice sets so i can just roll for all attacks at once (if the target is still at full hp). While your build looks very good and interesting it still has too much casting for my liking (for this particular campaign), but i will surely play something like this in the future. I don't think we'll be able to get above 20 with asi. So you're saying that i should go STR based for melee or DEX for ranged, seems no one really uses dual wielding for power gaming. Fighter/Ranger/Rogue combo seems nice and doesn't have spellcasting (as i want it for this character), but what about having 20 Fighter and 10/10 Rogue/Ranger? Would that really weaken the build? Or is 20/20 really the way to go? I don't really want a character that spends everything in 1st round then be kinda useless, i'd like a great 1st round with pretty decent DPR after that. (Maybe like 1st round assassinate and get all the crits in but then i still have sneak attack and colossus slayer or similar things for the rounds after, on top of all the extra attacks) This could work nicely too! Well at first i was thinking about DEX and CON based Fighter with dual wielding but it seems dual wielding has lower damage output than 2h weapons or crossbows. My initial plan was 20 Fighter Battlemaster then 5 Rogue Assassin/Ranger Hunter/ Barbarian Bear totem/ Monk (not sure which one but Drunk master would be nice). [/QUOTE]

Verification