Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Helping melee combat to be more competitive to ranged.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FormerlyHemlock" data-source="post: 6983740" data-attributes="member: 6787650"><p>CapnZapp, you specifically asked me to explain why I felt CE was a poor use of your bonus action. If you wanted to say, "But I like the other parts of CE more," you could have said so up front. But you asked me to explain my remarks on the bonus action part, which comes down to "mobility, hiding, and meat shields are all better". (There are also some niche cases of pseudo-meat-shields like Flaming Sphere, but I'm not a fan of those in the general case. Maybe in certain campaigns I would be.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You snipped the part where I mentioned the other part of the cost: a mobility spell (e.g. Expeditious Retreat) or Skulker + two levels of Rogue.</p><p></p><p>There's not an "exact build" because there's not only one way to do it. There are some general principles that apply: taking no damage by keeping out of range or being untargetable is better than a modest boost to damage. Some examples of applying these principles include:</p><p></p><p>A Mobile Sharpshooter Eldritch Knight archer who uses Expeditious Retreat to kill anything with a 40' move or below, and against anything with less than 80' move can switch to a rapier and kill it that way instead. (Thanks to Mobile feat and bonus action Dash for 80', of course--I'm not sure how much I need to spell out so if I skip over something I should explain let me know.)</p><p></p><p>An Skulker Arcane Trickster 3/Battlemaster X archer who sneaks around in the dark killing things. Darkvision turns darkness to light obscurement, and Skulker lets you hide in light obscurement, so Skulker + Cunning Action + Stealth Expertise lets you hide with high reliability from anything that relies on normal sight or darkvision, which is most things in the MM. So you shoot the thing with advantage (probably with -5/+10 if you happen to have Sharpshooter too) as many times as you have attacks, then Hide and move to a new position. If it wants to attack you back it has to randomly pick a position to attack in the hopes that you'll just happen to be there, and even if it chooses right it's at disadvantage on its attacks because you're hidden from it. (Unless it's Alert, but monsters hardly ever are Alert.) If you have to do a fight in broad daylight you use your Arcane Trickster spell slots to cast Fog Cloud and just hide inside that instead.</p><p></p><p>An Eldritch Knight 11/Rogue 2/Wizard X could do the same trick using Greater Invisibility instead of Skulker/Fog Cloud. (You'd probably go Fighter 1, then Rogue 2, then Wizard 7, and then spend the next ten levels levelling up Fighter to EK 11.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, you could take them both. But I generally find that my bonus action is already quite busy, busy enough that spending a whole feat on a modest damage bonus attack feels like a complete waste. I'm probably affected by the fact that I <em>also</em> think the Crossbow Expert ruling is cheesey. But remember that I'm responding to <em>your</em> claim that Sharpshooter + Crossbow Expert is a dominant strategy which renders others nonviable and unnecessary. The burden of proof is on you to show that I'm somehow missing out by not going Crossbow Expert.</p><p></p><p>I'm not missing anything important.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's close but not quite accurate. Everybody <em>who is engaged with the monsters</em> needs to do it, or the monsters will just hit somebody else. It's true that an all-Mobile party is fantastically fun and easy to play well with; but even if you've only got one guy that's a Mobile Shadow Monk, your party now has a trump card that beats many common situations without resource expenditure. You need good enough reconnaissance to know when to <em>use</em> that trump card, but recon is another topic for another time.</p><p></p><p>Suffice to say that three PCs engaged with three Displacer Beasts can still benefit from hiding even if only two of them can hide, to the extent that the third PC can disengage himself from the monsters. It could be that he's a heavily-armored AC 20 Life Cleric who drops a Sanctuary or Shield of Faith on himself and then Dodges; or maybe he's a Sorcerer who Disengages and casts Expeditious Retreat to flee out of their range; or maybe he Levitates; or maybe the geometry is such that he was far enough (30'? 120'? 600'? remember that the PCs control this) behind the point men that he never has to enter melee in the first place.</p><p></p><p>I'm obviously not making the claim that hiding prevents you from ever taking any damage ever. (Although I <em>have</em> had to introduce some rule variants to tone hiding down a bit, including letting certain monsters with blindsense like Black Puddings ignore Dexterity (Stealth) hide attempts completely.) I am claiming that under reasonable assumptions, it's a very strong tool to have in your toolbox and better than Crossbow Expert is.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, if you can control who the monsters are going to focus their fire on, it's great! My players <em>love</em> knowing who the monsters are going to focus their fire on (I use a declare/act simultaneous initiative system, so dumb monsters don't get the chance to change their actions in response to PC action declarations.) Dodging is free.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I certainly don't. Unless they are paranoid supra-geniuses like Mind Flayers--and BTW, the "efficient" action from many monsters is often "run away and live to fight another day," which is frustrating for players. So not fighting efficiently is an important part of running a fun game.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you've already committed to the Rogue levels, CE feels like a waste.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FormerlyHemlock, post: 6983740, member: 6787650"] CapnZapp, you specifically asked me to explain why I felt CE was a poor use of your bonus action. If you wanted to say, "But I like the other parts of CE more," you could have said so up front. But you asked me to explain my remarks on the bonus action part, which comes down to "mobility, hiding, and meat shields are all better". (There are also some niche cases of pseudo-meat-shields like Flaming Sphere, but I'm not a fan of those in the general case. Maybe in certain campaigns I would be.) You snipped the part where I mentioned the other part of the cost: a mobility spell (e.g. Expeditious Retreat) or Skulker + two levels of Rogue. There's not an "exact build" because there's not only one way to do it. There are some general principles that apply: taking no damage by keeping out of range or being untargetable is better than a modest boost to damage. Some examples of applying these principles include: A Mobile Sharpshooter Eldritch Knight archer who uses Expeditious Retreat to kill anything with a 40' move or below, and against anything with less than 80' move can switch to a rapier and kill it that way instead. (Thanks to Mobile feat and bonus action Dash for 80', of course--I'm not sure how much I need to spell out so if I skip over something I should explain let me know.) An Skulker Arcane Trickster 3/Battlemaster X archer who sneaks around in the dark killing things. Darkvision turns darkness to light obscurement, and Skulker lets you hide in light obscurement, so Skulker + Cunning Action + Stealth Expertise lets you hide with high reliability from anything that relies on normal sight or darkvision, which is most things in the MM. So you shoot the thing with advantage (probably with -5/+10 if you happen to have Sharpshooter too) as many times as you have attacks, then Hide and move to a new position. If it wants to attack you back it has to randomly pick a position to attack in the hopes that you'll just happen to be there, and even if it chooses right it's at disadvantage on its attacks because you're hidden from it. (Unless it's Alert, but monsters hardly ever are Alert.) If you have to do a fight in broad daylight you use your Arcane Trickster spell slots to cast Fog Cloud and just hide inside that instead. An Eldritch Knight 11/Rogue 2/Wizard X could do the same trick using Greater Invisibility instead of Skulker/Fog Cloud. (You'd probably go Fighter 1, then Rogue 2, then Wizard 7, and then spend the next ten levels levelling up Fighter to EK 11.) Sure, you could take them both. But I generally find that my bonus action is already quite busy, busy enough that spending a whole feat on a modest damage bonus attack feels like a complete waste. I'm probably affected by the fact that I [I]also[/I] think the Crossbow Expert ruling is cheesey. But remember that I'm responding to [I]your[/I] claim that Sharpshooter + Crossbow Expert is a dominant strategy which renders others nonviable and unnecessary. The burden of proof is on you to show that I'm somehow missing out by not going Crossbow Expert. I'm not missing anything important. That's close but not quite accurate. Everybody [I]who is engaged with the monsters[/I] needs to do it, or the monsters will just hit somebody else. It's true that an all-Mobile party is fantastically fun and easy to play well with; but even if you've only got one guy that's a Mobile Shadow Monk, your party now has a trump card that beats many common situations without resource expenditure. You need good enough reconnaissance to know when to [I]use[/I] that trump card, but recon is another topic for another time. Suffice to say that three PCs engaged with three Displacer Beasts can still benefit from hiding even if only two of them can hide, to the extent that the third PC can disengage himself from the monsters. It could be that he's a heavily-armored AC 20 Life Cleric who drops a Sanctuary or Shield of Faith on himself and then Dodges; or maybe he's a Sorcerer who Disengages and casts Expeditious Retreat to flee out of their range; or maybe he Levitates; or maybe the geometry is such that he was far enough (30'? 120'? 600'? remember that the PCs control this) behind the point men that he never has to enter melee in the first place. I'm obviously not making the claim that hiding prevents you from ever taking any damage ever. (Although I [I]have[/I] had to introduce some rule variants to tone hiding down a bit, including letting certain monsters with blindsense like Black Puddings ignore Dexterity (Stealth) hide attempts completely.) I am claiming that under reasonable assumptions, it's a very strong tool to have in your toolbox and better than Crossbow Expert is. Actually, if you can control who the monsters are going to focus their fire on, it's great! My players [I]love[/I] knowing who the monsters are going to focus their fire on (I use a declare/act simultaneous initiative system, so dumb monsters don't get the chance to change their actions in response to PC action declarations.) Dodging is free. I certainly don't. Unless they are paranoid supra-geniuses like Mind Flayers--and BTW, the "efficient" action from many monsters is often "run away and live to fight another day," which is frustrating for players. So not fighting efficiently is an important part of running a fun game. If you've already committed to the Rogue levels, CE feels like a waste. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Helping melee combat to be more competitive to ranged.
Top