Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Helping melee combat to be more competitive to ranged.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FormerlyHemlock" data-source="post: 6988022" data-attributes="member: 6787650"><p><strong>Response to CapnZapp's query</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I thought I'd addressed Drizzt and Zorro already, in this post:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Now Drizz't gets to make six attacks per round at 11th level (three with +Dex to damage, three without using his off-hand weapon), and Zorro likewise gets to make three rapier attacks and three whipcracks. (The whip attacks will probably be better-spent on Disarm attempts than damage attempts.) That's enough to make Crossbow Expert Sharpshooters look pretty sad* by comparison, except that they still have the intrinsic advantages of range such as getting to attack on rounds while Zorro is busy Dashing, and not being turned to stone by Medusas.</p><p></p><p>* Well, not the whips so much, since that's only a Fighting Style. But if Crossbow Expert Sharpshooter with Archery and Magic Crossbow +1 And Advantage From Faerie Fire is doing <strong>75 </strong>DPR at 20th level vs. AC 20, then Zorro the Dual Wielder Magic Initiate with Two Weapon Fighting and Advantage From Faerie Fire and two Rapiers +1 and Hex is doing <strong>104 </strong>DPR at 20th level, plus he still has his bonus action free and his AC is one point higher. If he gets a bonus action set of attacks from GWM then his DPR is <strong>130</strong>. Or he could go more defensive and take Defensive Duelist, or whatever he wants. </p><p></p><p>If you wanted to boost feats instead of fighting styles, eh, six of one/half a dozen of the other. That part isn't worth arguing over--just do the one that fits better for your playstyle.</p><p></p><p>=====================================</p><p></p><p><strong>RE: MM</strong>, there are definite issues with the MM but they're not really related to monster HP totals. Besides, as I pointed out already, the baseline party damage doesn't budge much from PHB rules unless you happen to have an all-offensive-Fighter party, in which case they <em>deserve</em> to do 200% of a normal party's damage since they've sacrificed so much else from spells to mobility to defense to healing.</p><p></p><p>MM issues tend to be related more to:</p><p></p><p>(1) boringness of monsters, </p><p></p><p>(2) combat-centric stat blocks (no Organization/Number Appearing or Favored Terrain/Climate or Treasure Type or Diet or Habits or Frequency or...), </p><p></p><p>(3) absurdly short and predictable ranges on monster special abilities that make monsters easy to "solve" with plain old SOP tactics, </p><p></p><p>(4) boringness of resistances/vulnerabilities (imagine if vampires took triple damage from bone or wooden weapons and half damage from metal or stone weapons, and devils were vulnerable to silver while demons were vulnerable to cold iron), </p><p></p><p>(5) the fact that even monsters with potentially interesting tactical options force you to infer them (hmmm, this Grung monster has a leaping ability and missile weapons and stealth and the shamans can cast Spike Growth--they probably like to bait PCs into chasing them into Spike Growth, then the Shaman casts Plant Growth to trap the PCs there even more while all the Grungs throw poisoned daggers), </p><p></p><p>(6) boringness of lore... if you want an interesting monster you pretty much have to either steal it from other sources <a href="http://hackslashmaster.blogspot.com/2013/09/on-ecology-of-orc.html" target="_blank">like this one</a> or create it out of whole cloth. It would be a huge improvement if the MM even just had three or four rumors (alleged factoids, possibly contradictory) about each monster. But no, they spend half their space on listing combat stats and the other half on cliched vagaries.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I mean, really? What did that tell me that I wouldn't have assumed anyway from watching Lord of the Rings? Compare that with these juicy rumors:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Try and tell me that those four lies(?) don't spark more fun adventure ideas than the MM entry. What about a rural village filled with people who actually <em>believe</em> lie #2 about elves in masks, and consequently hate elves for atrocities committed by orcs? Who do you think might have been planting those rumors and why? (Maybe a demon?) Or what if in <em>this</em> campaign, it's actually true, in whole or in part? What if elves sometimes do dress up like orcs in order to commit atrocities? What if the players are attacked by orcs who try to steal their treasure, but when they examine the corpses very closely, they turn out to be elves in masks--a sort of elvish Klu Klux Klan? What then? The story doesn't quite write itself but it's going somewhere that the MM isn't.</p><p></p><p>The MM is not evocative, and not inspiring.</p><p></p><p>(7) Combat stats are exceedingly easy to fix. If all the PCs have 60 DPR and I was expecting 30, and it's important to me that the players' choices not be allowed to alter my planned adventure (bad idea BTW), I can just include sqrt(2) times more monsters. 41% more monsters doing 41% more damage per round for 41% longer will inflict <strong>1.41 * 1.41 ~= 2</strong> times the casualties/resource expenditure on the PCs. (This is exactly why minions are strong.) But remember, I don't recommend doing this in the first place. Instead of the DM setting up scenes for PCs to interact with, I prefer to telegraph danger and let players choose their own desired level of risk-to-reward. I don't have to <em>predict </em>how tough the players are going to be; I merely have to be somewhat <em>predictable</em>, a la "You're now deep on level X of the dungeon." Then throw in enough unknowable variables (for the players--"what's in the locked sarcophagus?") on top and gambles for unknown stakes (to the players--"the giant is shaking his dice and gesturing encouragingly to you to sit down and play with him, but you can't understand a word he says except that it somehow involves Sarah") to make it fun for me to run.</p><p></p><p>Add that all up and you'll see why, out of all the things that concern me about the MM, the DPR of a theoretically-optimal all-offensively-oriented-Fighter party ranks very low on my list.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FormerlyHemlock, post: 6988022, member: 6787650"] [b]Response to CapnZapp's query[/b] I thought I'd addressed Drizzt and Zorro already, in this post: Now Drizz't gets to make six attacks per round at 11th level (three with +Dex to damage, three without using his off-hand weapon), and Zorro likewise gets to make three rapier attacks and three whipcracks. (The whip attacks will probably be better-spent on Disarm attempts than damage attempts.) That's enough to make Crossbow Expert Sharpshooters look pretty sad* by comparison, except that they still have the intrinsic advantages of range such as getting to attack on rounds while Zorro is busy Dashing, and not being turned to stone by Medusas. * Well, not the whips so much, since that's only a Fighting Style. But if Crossbow Expert Sharpshooter with Archery and Magic Crossbow +1 And Advantage From Faerie Fire is doing [B]75 [/B]DPR at 20th level vs. AC 20, then Zorro the Dual Wielder Magic Initiate with Two Weapon Fighting and Advantage From Faerie Fire and two Rapiers +1 and Hex is doing [B]104 [/B]DPR at 20th level, plus he still has his bonus action free and his AC is one point higher. If he gets a bonus action set of attacks from GWM then his DPR is [B]130[/B]. Or he could go more defensive and take Defensive Duelist, or whatever he wants. If you wanted to boost feats instead of fighting styles, eh, six of one/half a dozen of the other. That part isn't worth arguing over--just do the one that fits better for your playstyle. ===================================== [B]RE: MM[/B], there are definite issues with the MM but they're not really related to monster HP totals. Besides, as I pointed out already, the baseline party damage doesn't budge much from PHB rules unless you happen to have an all-offensive-Fighter party, in which case they [I]deserve[/I] to do 200% of a normal party's damage since they've sacrificed so much else from spells to mobility to defense to healing. MM issues tend to be related more to: (1) boringness of monsters, (2) combat-centric stat blocks (no Organization/Number Appearing or Favored Terrain/Climate or Treasure Type or Diet or Habits or Frequency or...), (3) absurdly short and predictable ranges on monster special abilities that make monsters easy to "solve" with plain old SOP tactics, (4) boringness of resistances/vulnerabilities (imagine if vampires took triple damage from bone or wooden weapons and half damage from metal or stone weapons, and devils were vulnerable to silver while demons were vulnerable to cold iron), (5) the fact that even monsters with potentially interesting tactical options force you to infer them (hmmm, this Grung monster has a leaping ability and missile weapons and stealth and the shamans can cast Spike Growth--they probably like to bait PCs into chasing them into Spike Growth, then the Shaman casts Plant Growth to trap the PCs there even more while all the Grungs throw poisoned daggers), (6) boringness of lore... if you want an interesting monster you pretty much have to either steal it from other sources [URL="http://hackslashmaster.blogspot.com/2013/09/on-ecology-of-orc.html"]like this one[/URL] or create it out of whole cloth. It would be a huge improvement if the MM even just had three or four rumors (alleged factoids, possibly contradictory) about each monster. But no, they spend half their space on listing combat stats and the other half on cliched vagaries. I mean, really? What did that tell me that I wouldn't have assumed anyway from watching Lord of the Rings? Compare that with these juicy rumors: Try and tell me that those four lies(?) don't spark more fun adventure ideas than the MM entry. What about a rural village filled with people who actually [I]believe[/I] lie #2 about elves in masks, and consequently hate elves for atrocities committed by orcs? Who do you think might have been planting those rumors and why? (Maybe a demon?) Or what if in [I]this[/I] campaign, it's actually true, in whole or in part? What if elves sometimes do dress up like orcs in order to commit atrocities? What if the players are attacked by orcs who try to steal their treasure, but when they examine the corpses very closely, they turn out to be elves in masks--a sort of elvish Klu Klux Klan? What then? The story doesn't quite write itself but it's going somewhere that the MM isn't. The MM is not evocative, and not inspiring. (7) Combat stats are exceedingly easy to fix. If all the PCs have 60 DPR and I was expecting 30, and it's important to me that the players' choices not be allowed to alter my planned adventure (bad idea BTW), I can just include sqrt(2) times more monsters. 41% more monsters doing 41% more damage per round for 41% longer will inflict [B]1.41 * 1.41 ~= 2[/B] times the casualties/resource expenditure on the PCs. (This is exactly why minions are strong.) But remember, I don't recommend doing this in the first place. Instead of the DM setting up scenes for PCs to interact with, I prefer to telegraph danger and let players choose their own desired level of risk-to-reward. I don't have to [I]predict [/I]how tough the players are going to be; I merely have to be somewhat [I]predictable[/I], a la "You're now deep on level X of the dungeon." Then throw in enough unknowable variables (for the players--"what's in the locked sarcophagus?") on top and gambles for unknown stakes (to the players--"the giant is shaking his dice and gesturing encouragingly to you to sit down and play with him, but you can't understand a word he says except that it somehow involves Sarah") to make it fun for me to run. Add that all up and you'll see why, out of all the things that concern me about the MM, the DPR of a theoretically-optimal all-offensively-oriented-Fighter party ranks very low on my list. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Helping melee combat to be more competitive to ranged.
Top