Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 7411363" data-attributes="member: 1465">The idea of a Basic+Expert+Advanced game was mentioned during 5e playtest years. It's kind of still there really, if you consider some low-complexity character choices vs high-complexity, but it's not presented upfront in the books, and the low/high complexity range is not that  big.I would actually prefer if WotC extended the range downward, for example by providing a super-simple Wizard archetype and Cleric domain.As for higher complexity choices, I would like more well-designed feats for sure, and I am looking forward to the alternative class features that Mearls mentioned last year.I am not sure the monsters need more complexity instead. For that,and to increase the challenges, the recipe is there already :- complicate the environment - freely add class abilities, feats or magic items to monsters - study monsters tactics at themonstersknow.com</blockquote>