Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Here's That SCAG Table of Contents!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 7681936" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>Uhmmm.... really can't say yet if I am interested or not.</p><p></p><p>About the lore part, probably I don't need. I'd like to play 5e adventures set in the Forgotten Realms, but since I totally disliked the changes during 4e, and the 5e realms still depend on those, I might just keep using my 3e FR books for the setting.</p><p></p><p>I would certainly be interested in the 'crunch', but I have to say that the page count doesn't look that good. It's hard to say from the ToC, but we have 24 pages for classes (2 per class), 12 pages for background (12 new backgrounds), and some races material as well. </p><p></p><p>Personally I think we need more subclasses rather than backgrounds. Furthermore, a background is mostly just 2 skills + 2 tools/languages + 1 downtime feature. The traits/ideals/bonds/flaws are very useful, tho not strictly 'crunch'. But besides new dowtime features, the rest is something that already exists in the game. You can just pick 2 skills + 2 tools/langs and have a new background.</p><p></p><p>OTOH new subclasses are not something that can be designed as easily as a new background, so new subclasses are really the main thing I would be looking for in a supplement book. It looks like every class <em>might</em> get at least a new subclass (except the Ranger, apparently) OR at least new sub-subclasses (e.g. new Totem animals), if this is the case then GREAT! At least we already know that some are certainly in (e.g. Swashbuckler). But it's not really possible to tell from the ToC, it might be that those 1-2 pages are just spent on rambling about "how to fit the existing (sub)classes in FR", which would be a huge disappointment for me.</p><p></p><p>I welcome the new races options however, especially Half-Elf and Tiefling 'option'. These would probably be a bit like subraces, and could have been in the PHB if they had designed them already at that time, but it's good that nearly all races get the same treatment (Half-Orcs being leftover for now).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 7681936, member: 1465"] Uhmmm.... really can't say yet if I am interested or not. About the lore part, probably I don't need. I'd like to play 5e adventures set in the Forgotten Realms, but since I totally disliked the changes during 4e, and the 5e realms still depend on those, I might just keep using my 3e FR books for the setting. I would certainly be interested in the 'crunch', but I have to say that the page count doesn't look that good. It's hard to say from the ToC, but we have 24 pages for classes (2 per class), 12 pages for background (12 new backgrounds), and some races material as well. Personally I think we need more subclasses rather than backgrounds. Furthermore, a background is mostly just 2 skills + 2 tools/languages + 1 downtime feature. The traits/ideals/bonds/flaws are very useful, tho not strictly 'crunch'. But besides new dowtime features, the rest is something that already exists in the game. You can just pick 2 skills + 2 tools/langs and have a new background. OTOH new subclasses are not something that can be designed as easily as a new background, so new subclasses are really the main thing I would be looking for in a supplement book. It looks like every class [I]might[/I] get at least a new subclass (except the Ranger, apparently) OR at least new sub-subclasses (e.g. new Totem animals), if this is the case then GREAT! At least we already know that some are certainly in (e.g. Swashbuckler). But it's not really possible to tell from the ToC, it might be that those 1-2 pages are just spent on rambling about "how to fit the existing (sub)classes in FR", which would be a huge disappointment for me. I welcome the new races options however, especially Half-Elf and Tiefling 'option'. These would probably be a bit like subraces, and could have been in the PHB if they had designed them already at that time, but it's good that nearly all races get the same treatment (Half-Orcs being leftover for now). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Here's That SCAG Table of Contents!
Top