Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 7681939" data-attributes="member: 1465">This would mean that PHB+DMG+AG subclasses would be:Barbarians: 4Bards: 4Clerics: 9Druids: 4Fighters: 4Monks: 5Paladins: 5Rogues: 5Rangers: 2Sorcerers: 3Warlock: 4Wizard: 9That's not bad at all, also considering that some of those subclasses are themselves flexible.But personally I think there won't be that many in the AG, because probably in many cases we only get additions to existing subclasses. I think Mearls already mentioned about new spirit animals for the Totem Barbarian, and similarly there could be more terrains for the Druid of the Land and more special abilities for elemental Monks, so we might actually not get any new subclasses for them.Well I seriously wish you are right <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> I thought since the start that clerical domains were too few, during 3e we had a lot of them already in the PHB, so if we could get a dozen new domains it would be a huge improvement, especially for FR where religions are so important.But I am skeptic that this will be the case, probably the religion section is so huge simply because they wanted to list a lot of FR deities (including the racial pantheons), just with fluff and no crunch.</blockquote>