Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ilbranteloth" data-source="post: 7208596" data-attributes="member: 6778044">This looks pretty interesting. I'll try to go through the earlier threads so see where the discussion went. But I like it so far.A few questions (that may have been answered in the earlier threads but a recap here might be helpful):Have you tried using the AD&D-style multiclassing? Divide the XP in half and just have two separate classes?I think the class as you've built it looks pretty balanced in regards to other classes. However, I wonder why any (half-)elf would be any other class if it's built this way.While it has the flavor of the AD&D version, what it lacks is the disadvantage of going this route - the fact that you advance half as quickly as other classes. Another factor, if you used the old multiclassing approach, then the highest level would be 10/10, not that far off from the AD&D 7/11 F-MU. In this case, you are advancing as quickly as everybody else and you're able to essentially be a 20th level fighter and wizard.It's an interesting conundrum, actually. You've designed a well-balanced class that covers what you're trying to achieve, to the degree that there really isn't a reason for a (half-)elf to be just a fighter or just a wizard. Now that you have me thinking about it, I'm going to have to think some more. Off to read what I can find for your earlier threads...</blockquote>