Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Here's why we want a Psion class
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Perun" data-source="post: 7969110" data-attributes="member: 6037"><p>I'd go with manifesting displays in any case. You need some sort of indicator that the psion is manifesting in order for his powers to be dispellable. Or, as an alternative, you could say that in case the psion opts to casts/manifest (the terminology is confusing) a spell without components, he gets a display instead. You could say that when not using components, the strain of the mental focus is so strong, it causes noticeable displays of psionic power, but using components helps ease this strain, and therefore no displays. </p><p></p><p>As for the components, there are a lot of ways this could be developed. You could say that Con saves to maintain concentration on a spell are easier when using components, so the DC for any such Con save is reduced by a given amount (-2? -5?), or, alternatively, that the psion gets advantage on Con saves to maintain concentration on a spell cast using components. This is similar to one of the benefits given by the War Caster feat, so a bonus to the Con save would be cumulative with the feat, while the advantage option would make the feat less valuable to psions. </p><p></p><p>One option would also be to get rid of all inexpensive material components for psion spells on a general principle, and, in case they were used, would replace them by a psionic focus by default. So, <em>friends </em>cantrip would never require 'a small amount of make up applied to the face as the spell is cast', but would use a psionic focus (a crystal or an orb, presumably) instead. </p><p></p><p>Building up on the theme. I could see how a version of Psionic Sorcery (from the Psionic Soul sorcerer bloodline) might work for a psion. Say it's established that the use of verbal and somatic components and psionic foci is not required for psions in order to cast their spells, and psions use them merely as aids in order to achieve the state of mind required to cast (or manifest, if you will) a spell. Then you use a version of psionic sorcery (with a different name, of course), and you get component-less manifesting. Psions could even get a bonus to the roll, in order to emphasise the point (say, at level 3 you apply one-half of your proficiency bonus to the roll). </p><p></p><p>There are a <em>lot</em> of possibilities here...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Perun, post: 7969110, member: 6037"] I'd go with manifesting displays in any case. You need some sort of indicator that the psion is manifesting in order for his powers to be dispellable. Or, as an alternative, you could say that in case the psion opts to casts/manifest (the terminology is confusing) a spell without components, he gets a display instead. You could say that when not using components, the strain of the mental focus is so strong, it causes noticeable displays of psionic power, but using components helps ease this strain, and therefore no displays. As for the components, there are a lot of ways this could be developed. You could say that Con saves to maintain concentration on a spell are easier when using components, so the DC for any such Con save is reduced by a given amount (-2? -5?), or, alternatively, that the psion gets advantage on Con saves to maintain concentration on a spell cast using components. This is similar to one of the benefits given by the War Caster feat, so a bonus to the Con save would be cumulative with the feat, while the advantage option would make the feat less valuable to psions. One option would also be to get rid of all inexpensive material components for psion spells on a general principle, and, in case they were used, would replace them by a psionic focus by default. So, [I]friends [/I]cantrip would never require 'a small amount of make up applied to the face as the spell is cast', but would use a psionic focus (a crystal or an orb, presumably) instead. Building up on the theme. I could see how a version of Psionic Sorcery (from the Psionic Soul sorcerer bloodline) might work for a psion. Say it's established that the use of verbal and somatic components and psionic foci is not required for psions in order to cast their spells, and psions use them merely as aids in order to achieve the state of mind required to cast (or manifest, if you will) a spell. Then you use a version of psionic sorcery (with a different name, of course), and you get component-less manifesting. Psions could even get a bonus to the roll, in order to emphasise the point (say, at level 3 you apply one-half of your proficiency bonus to the roll). There are a [I]lot[/I] of possibilities here... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Here's why we want a Psion class
Top