Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Hero Lab Supports Pathfinder Roleplaying Game!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LWDPressRelease" data-source="post: 4897583" data-attributes="member: 77732"><p>If we were to start writing Hero Lab from scratch tomorrow, then your argument would have some merit to it. However, Hero Lab traces its roots to two other products of ours, and shares a common code base with them. Those products - and portions of the codebase - date back to 1997. Twelve years ago, there were no good solutions for cross-platform portability between Mac and Windows. Heck, many major companies wasted tens of millions of dollars apiece trying to develop suitable cross-platform solutions back in those days. Since Hero Lab is built on a foundation that long pre-dates the recent cross-platform solutions, it is tied to Windows.</p><p></p><p>Would I prefer to have a native Mac or cross-platform solution? Absolutely! But then we would need to stop forward progress for nearly a year while we re-worked everything for Mac compatibility. Alternately, we could re-write everything in a new language that provides cross-platform portability, but that would entail an even longer period (our active codebase is roughly 500,000 lines of C++ code). That's a huge opportunity for someone else to come in and overtake us in terms of features and functionality. So it's not a viable business option. And since our development staff is only two guys, it's not possible for us to do a port in parallel.</p><p></p><p>There is no irrational fear of change here - just practical business trade-offs being made, which are purely rational.</p><p></p><p>It's frustrating when very bright people take a myopic view of business from a single vantage point, without considering that there might be other factors involved. This lack of perspective results in blanket statements being made that are wholly inappropriate and patently incorrect. And then people like myself are left with the choice of either ignoring the misinformation (and allowing it to propagate through lack of any challenge) or rebutting it (and thereby having to "dress down" someone who I'm sure means well). It's a lose-lose situation, and I hate being stuck with it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LWDPressRelease, post: 4897583, member: 77732"] If we were to start writing Hero Lab from scratch tomorrow, then your argument would have some merit to it. However, Hero Lab traces its roots to two other products of ours, and shares a common code base with them. Those products - and portions of the codebase - date back to 1997. Twelve years ago, there were no good solutions for cross-platform portability between Mac and Windows. Heck, many major companies wasted tens of millions of dollars apiece trying to develop suitable cross-platform solutions back in those days. Since Hero Lab is built on a foundation that long pre-dates the recent cross-platform solutions, it is tied to Windows. Would I prefer to have a native Mac or cross-platform solution? Absolutely! But then we would need to stop forward progress for nearly a year while we re-worked everything for Mac compatibility. Alternately, we could re-write everything in a new language that provides cross-platform portability, but that would entail an even longer period (our active codebase is roughly 500,000 lines of C++ code). That's a huge opportunity for someone else to come in and overtake us in terms of features and functionality. So it's not a viable business option. And since our development staff is only two guys, it's not possible for us to do a port in parallel. There is no irrational fear of change here - just practical business trade-offs being made, which are purely rational. It's frustrating when very bright people take a myopic view of business from a single vantage point, without considering that there might be other factors involved. This lack of perspective results in blanket statements being made that are wholly inappropriate and patently incorrect. And then people like myself are left with the choice of either ignoring the misinformation (and allowing it to propagate through lack of any challenge) or rebutting it (and thereby having to "dress down" someone who I'm sure means well). It's a lose-lose situation, and I hate being stuck with it. :( [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Hero Lab Supports Pathfinder Roleplaying Game!
Top