Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Heroes Reborn
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Man in the Funny Hat" data-source="post: 6266735" data-attributes="member: 32740"><p>I thought the first season of Heroes was awesomesauce. Well, the finale left much to be desired - the closer it got to the final episode the more apparant it was that the writers were struggling to get all the characters into the same place at the same time and to actually pay off on the premise, the catchphrase, "Save the cheerleader. Save the world." The final fight should have been a really cool knock-down drag-out but they later admitted that they simply ran out of time and money to do better.</p><p></p><p>After they resolved that first season arc they really had difficulty in finding something to DRIVE the show forward. They introduced SO MANY new characters with really interesting powers - characters that could have featured in the stories in all kinds of ways and yet the ONLY thing they seemed to think they could do with them was to just kill them. Even without a constant stream of red-shirted new-power heroes the show had a l<em>arge </em>cast and they were going in a half-dozen utterly unrelated directions at once.</p><p></p><p>They brought back the BBEG for the rest of the series but every freakin' week it seemed that the episode was being written by a different writer and NONE of them were following any kind of series writers guidelines. He's a bad guy - no, he's a GOOD guy! - no wait, he's just kinda mean, no he's actually just misunderstood, no he's REALLY monstrously evilly bad, no wait he's good this week... It was a dictionary example of sophmoric writing: "conceited and overconfident of knowledge but poorly informed and immature." They thought they knew what they were doing because the freshman season had succeeded so wildly but as a sophmore show they only proved they didn't really get it - they had simply lucked out the first year. The show bounced around with a few ideas of possible good directions to take things that were always abandoned or eviscerated after only a few episodes.</p><p></p><p>The biggest crime was that none of the writers seemed to have read a comic book in their life and after the first season had no clue how a neophyte super-hero should react to anything or what they should do.</p><p></p><p>I will be interested to see what they do and so I suppose I'll watch it. New cast with just some cameos of original characters, and all new plot/story - it might work. But I'm not holding my breath. They had three seasons after the success of the first to get that show on track and they failed. If all they're doing is applying the same "formula" of those three seasons to a new cast then it's doomed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Man in the Funny Hat, post: 6266735, member: 32740"] I thought the first season of Heroes was awesomesauce. Well, the finale left much to be desired - the closer it got to the final episode the more apparant it was that the writers were struggling to get all the characters into the same place at the same time and to actually pay off on the premise, the catchphrase, "Save the cheerleader. Save the world." The final fight should have been a really cool knock-down drag-out but they later admitted that they simply ran out of time and money to do better. After they resolved that first season arc they really had difficulty in finding something to DRIVE the show forward. They introduced SO MANY new characters with really interesting powers - characters that could have featured in the stories in all kinds of ways and yet the ONLY thing they seemed to think they could do with them was to just kill them. Even without a constant stream of red-shirted new-power heroes the show had a l[I]arge [/I]cast and they were going in a half-dozen utterly unrelated directions at once. They brought back the BBEG for the rest of the series but every freakin' week it seemed that the episode was being written by a different writer and NONE of them were following any kind of series writers guidelines. He's a bad guy - no, he's a GOOD guy! - no wait, he's just kinda mean, no he's actually just misunderstood, no he's REALLY monstrously evilly bad, no wait he's good this week... It was a dictionary example of sophmoric writing: "conceited and overconfident of knowledge but poorly informed and immature." They thought they knew what they were doing because the freshman season had succeeded so wildly but as a sophmore show they only proved they didn't really get it - they had simply lucked out the first year. The show bounced around with a few ideas of possible good directions to take things that were always abandoned or eviscerated after only a few episodes. The biggest crime was that none of the writers seemed to have read a comic book in their life and after the first season had no clue how a neophyte super-hero should react to anything or what they should do. I will be interested to see what they do and so I suppose I'll watch it. New cast with just some cameos of original characters, and all new plot/story - it might work. But I'm not holding my breath. They had three seasons after the success of the first to get that show on track and they failed. If all they're doing is applying the same "formula" of those three seasons to a new cast then it's doomed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Heroes Reborn
Top