Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Brown Jenkin" data-source="post: 3873724" data-attributes="member: 2572">But Issac did not paint an alternate timeline, he painted the existing timeline. Unless you think that existing Hiro (and now Peter) are not part of our current timeline because they teleported to a alternate timeline and back. All of Issac's paintings have come true in our current timeline, the ones showing New York destroyed and Peter in the biohazard room both were painted before they lept to the future and saw those particular events. Once they did the paintings were true for our current timeline because someone in our current timeline experienced them (and remembers them) no matter what the real future holds. Too further demonstrate my point in the series of eight this year the picture of Peter in the biohazard room is sequentially before the painting that looks like HRG being shot even though the Peter painting painting is theoretically in the future. This is because Peter experiences that (and is true for him) before the HRG painting in the current timeline. Also last year Issac painted Peter exploding. Peter did explode but he did so far above NYC. Everyone assumed that because there was a painting of NYC destroyed by a nuke blast and one of Peter exploding that these were the same event. They were not, they were seperate events that happened to seperate people each happening at different points in the timestream.</blockquote>