Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Herores of the Fallen Lands - Are Slayers underpowered?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Uller" data-source="post: 5488124" data-attributes="member: 413"><p>Since we tried out the slayer, I decided to help the party Rogue modify his PHB rogue to an Essentials Thief. I'm seeing a pattern...and while it is kewl from a player PC perspective (weee....we get 1st level characters dishing out 20 dmg per round) I'm not sure I like the dynamic.</p><p></p><p>I'm new to 4e, though...so maybe I'm missing something.</p><p></p><p>Rogues, Theives, Assassins..."Strikers" if you will...have been dealing out large amounts of damage since 1e. But mostly (not always) it was under some specific circumstance that more often than not required some careful planning on the part of the player, teamwork on the part of the party and substantial risk on the part of the PC...</p><p></p><p>Backstabs, etc always required something...</p><p></p><p>With the slayer, it's just his basic attack...Swing, hit about 2/3s of the time and do 1d12+9 (or +11 with the right stance) damage while others are doing 1d8+5...once per encounter, boost that to 2d12+11...</p><p></p><p>Now that I look at the Thief, he has 4 fairly easy ways to gain combat advantage (Tactical Trick and Ambush Trick...I think...I don't have my book here) and at first level do around 3d6+9 damage once per round (once per encounter boost that to 4d6+9. If he attacks first at the start of the encounter (which is likely), if he flanks and now if he uses one of two tricks that just require a foe with none of its allies adjacent (pretty likely in many fights) or has at least one of the Thief's allies next to it (again, very likely). </p><p></p><p>I guess what I'm saying is that I always thought the point of the striker was to require teamwork from others. Now it seems not so much. The other two strikers in essentials are Scout and Warlock...I have no idea how they fair compared to Slayer and Thief, but it looks about the same. Why not just have a party made entirely of those four?...maybe have a cleric for healing...It seems like they would be killing two opponents per turn fairly easily. </p><p></p><p>I'm still a fan of 4e and essentials...just noticing, that's all...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Uller, post: 5488124, member: 413"] Since we tried out the slayer, I decided to help the party Rogue modify his PHB rogue to an Essentials Thief. I'm seeing a pattern...and while it is kewl from a player PC perspective (weee....we get 1st level characters dishing out 20 dmg per round) I'm not sure I like the dynamic. I'm new to 4e, though...so maybe I'm missing something. Rogues, Theives, Assassins..."Strikers" if you will...have been dealing out large amounts of damage since 1e. But mostly (not always) it was under some specific circumstance that more often than not required some careful planning on the part of the player, teamwork on the part of the party and substantial risk on the part of the PC... Backstabs, etc always required something... With the slayer, it's just his basic attack...Swing, hit about 2/3s of the time and do 1d12+9 (or +11 with the right stance) damage while others are doing 1d8+5...once per encounter, boost that to 2d12+11... Now that I look at the Thief, he has 4 fairly easy ways to gain combat advantage (Tactical Trick and Ambush Trick...I think...I don't have my book here) and at first level do around 3d6+9 damage once per round (once per encounter boost that to 4d6+9. If he attacks first at the start of the encounter (which is likely), if he flanks and now if he uses one of two tricks that just require a foe with none of its allies adjacent (pretty likely in many fights) or has at least one of the Thief's allies next to it (again, very likely). I guess what I'm saying is that I always thought the point of the striker was to require teamwork from others. Now it seems not so much. The other two strikers in essentials are Scout and Warlock...I have no idea how they fair compared to Slayer and Thief, but it looks about the same. Why not just have a party made entirely of those four?...maybe have a cleric for healing...It seems like they would be killing two opponents per turn fairly easily. I'm still a fan of 4e and essentials...just noticing, that's all... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Herores of the Fallen Lands - Are Slayers underpowered?
Top