Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Herores of the Fallen Lands - Are Slayers underpowered?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5491798" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>As others have noted, I don't think that guy represents the average 1st level Thief. And I have one big issue with your math - assuming that the thief can regularly charge into Combat Advantage with Acrobat's Trick. I've found that getting CA for rogues isn't hard, but often involves shifting around an enemy. If your thief starts next to an enemy, you will not be able to back away and charge into the flank without taking at least one OA. Thus, a lot of your assume damage - from Acrobatic's Trick and Surprising Charge - is not available nearly as often as you are claiming. Sure, Acrobatic's Trick itself might be reasonable to use if you start your turn in flanking, but this idea about being able to bounce in and out of combat via move actions... not sure I buy it. </p><p> </p><p>But sure, I'm game, let's see how the PHB Rogue measures up. </p><p> </p><p>Level 1 Human Rogue, Brutal Scoundrel</p><p>Dex 20, Str 14</p><p>Silly Background = Rapier Proficiency</p><p>Backstabber, Light Blade Expertise</p><p>Piercing Strike with Combat Advantage: +11 vs Reflex 13: 3d8+8.</p><p>Damage: 0 (0 x 0.05 = Miss Chance) + 19.35 (21.5 x 0.9 = Hit Chance) + 1.6 (32 x 0.05 = Crit Chance) = 20.95 damage.</p><p> </p><p>Our result does indeed come out behind your Thief. Under, admittedly, ideal circumstances for the thief that make some pretty significant assumptions about battlefield conditions - including the thief never starting in melee combat with a foe. That seems relatively unlikely to me. Shall we look at your thief's numbers under, say, more reasonable conditions?</p><p> </p><p>First, though, I do want to note that the Rogue's damage is, undeniably, still twice what an average non-Striker will do. That was your original claim, remember - that this didn't happen prior to Essentials, and was a new thing. And it isn't true. The bugbear above was my very first 4E character. It was silly optimized, yeah, and the rest of the party totally noticed that it did stupid amounts of damage. And, of course, took absurd amounts in return, and was constantly limping around with too few surges - much like your thief will given his strategy of provoking OAs every turn. </p><p> </p><p>Now, what would a more legitimate comparison be? Let's take the charge assumption out of the equation - it is occasionally available to the Thief, but hardly something you can rely on. </p><p> </p><p>Level 1 Human Thief</p><p>Dex(20) +5</p><p>Rogue's Trick: Acrobat's Trick, Tactical Trick</p><p>Feat: Backstabber</p><p>Feat: Light Blade Expertise</p><p> </p><p>Basic Attack with Combat Advantage : +11 vs AC 15: 1d6+2d8+10.</p><p>Damage: 0 (0 x 0.15 = Miss Chance) + 19.125 (22.5 x 0.85 = Hit Chance) + 1.6 (32 x 0.05 = Crit Chance) = 20.725 damage.</p><p> </p><p>So, ignoring the charging build, these guys are coming out basically the same. Acrobatic's Trick gives the Thief the slight edge in raw damage, while the Rogue has the edge in accuracy, coming out fractionally ahead in total DPR. </p><p> </p><p>In the other arenas, I will certainly admit the Thief's tricks give an edge on being able to get CA with ranged attacks while immobilized. Does this mean that the Thief will always have CA when the rogue does not? Not at all, unfortunately - the main element I have found that deprives Rogues of CA is being Dazed, and that shuts down the Thief just as handily. </p><p> </p><p>Theorycraft, of course, won't be able to show us the exact breakdown on how often Rogues are unable to get CA and how often the Thief will have it in their place. From my experience, the big advantage will be for ranged builds - and even then, well-built Rogues can get CA just about as reliably as Thieves. So perhaps the actual benefit will be for melee builds who get <em>stuck </em>at range, which just is not that common a scenario. </p><p> </p><p>And, finally, if you trick out for a charging build... then, yes, the Thief can eke out an extra 3 points of damage in rounds in which he can safely charge with Acrobatic's Trick. Not that huge, and balanced against other harder to quantify benefits for the Rogue like the usefulness of Encounter and Daily Powers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5491798, member: 61155"] As others have noted, I don't think that guy represents the average 1st level Thief. And I have one big issue with your math - assuming that the thief can regularly charge into Combat Advantage with Acrobat's Trick. I've found that getting CA for rogues isn't hard, but often involves shifting around an enemy. If your thief starts next to an enemy, you will not be able to back away and charge into the flank without taking at least one OA. Thus, a lot of your assume damage - from Acrobatic's Trick and Surprising Charge - is not available nearly as often as you are claiming. Sure, Acrobatic's Trick itself might be reasonable to use if you start your turn in flanking, but this idea about being able to bounce in and out of combat via move actions... not sure I buy it. But sure, I'm game, let's see how the PHB Rogue measures up. Level 1 Human Rogue, Brutal Scoundrel Dex 20, Str 14 Silly Background = Rapier Proficiency Backstabber, Light Blade Expertise Piercing Strike with Combat Advantage: +11 vs Reflex 13: 3d8+8. Damage: 0 (0 x 0.05 = Miss Chance) + 19.35 (21.5 x 0.9 = Hit Chance) + 1.6 (32 x 0.05 = Crit Chance) = 20.95 damage. Our result does indeed come out behind your Thief. Under, admittedly, ideal circumstances for the thief that make some pretty significant assumptions about battlefield conditions - including the thief never starting in melee combat with a foe. That seems relatively unlikely to me. Shall we look at your thief's numbers under, say, more reasonable conditions? First, though, I do want to note that the Rogue's damage is, undeniably, still twice what an average non-Striker will do. That was your original claim, remember - that this didn't happen prior to Essentials, and was a new thing. And it isn't true. The bugbear above was my very first 4E character. It was silly optimized, yeah, and the rest of the party totally noticed that it did stupid amounts of damage. And, of course, took absurd amounts in return, and was constantly limping around with too few surges - much like your thief will given his strategy of provoking OAs every turn. Now, what would a more legitimate comparison be? Let's take the charge assumption out of the equation - it is occasionally available to the Thief, but hardly something you can rely on. Level 1 Human Thief Dex(20) +5 Rogue's Trick: Acrobat's Trick, Tactical Trick Feat: Backstabber Feat: Light Blade Expertise Basic Attack with Combat Advantage : +11 vs AC 15: 1d6+2d8+10. Damage: 0 (0 x 0.15 = Miss Chance) + 19.125 (22.5 x 0.85 = Hit Chance) + 1.6 (32 x 0.05 = Crit Chance) = 20.725 damage. So, ignoring the charging build, these guys are coming out basically the same. Acrobatic's Trick gives the Thief the slight edge in raw damage, while the Rogue has the edge in accuracy, coming out fractionally ahead in total DPR. In the other arenas, I will certainly admit the Thief's tricks give an edge on being able to get CA with ranged attacks while immobilized. Does this mean that the Thief will always have CA when the rogue does not? Not at all, unfortunately - the main element I have found that deprives Rogues of CA is being Dazed, and that shuts down the Thief just as handily. Theorycraft, of course, won't be able to show us the exact breakdown on how often Rogues are unable to get CA and how often the Thief will have it in their place. From my experience, the big advantage will be for ranged builds - and even then, well-built Rogues can get CA just about as reliably as Thieves. So perhaps the actual benefit will be for melee builds who get [I]stuck [/I]at range, which just is not that common a scenario. And, finally, if you trick out for a charging build... then, yes, the Thief can eke out an extra 3 points of damage in rounds in which he can safely charge with Acrobatic's Trick. Not that huge, and balanced against other harder to quantify benefits for the Rogue like the usefulness of Encounter and Daily Powers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Herores of the Fallen Lands - Are Slayers underpowered?
Top