Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="reapersaurus" data-source="post: 1184304" data-attributes="member: 1194">Well, if you believe that animals can do as much as cohorts, or they are as dangerous as cohorts, or can do much against cohort/PC defenses, than I doubt if what I say will sway your decision, but...  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown    :("  data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" />I count 270 total points on a quick count, not counting Champion opportunities (which are invalid to count in this comparison).In other words, most people would need to gain more than half of the remaining points and Number47 not gain one more point to be able to catch up to #47.For a look at the effect of valuing companions as 10 points, let's look at the point totals at the end of Round 4:#47: 168 pointsAvg of all other players: 1.2 points (that's including my 57 points)So the average player would have to make up 167 point handicap.</blockquote>