Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
hex rules for 4E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zinovia" data-source="post: 4264769" data-attributes="member: 57373"><p>I haven't closely examined the blast effects to the point of counting how many squares are affected, but my take on converting those to a hex grid was to make them what they should have been in the first place – <strong>cones</strong>. </p><p></p><p>Cones work great on a hex grid. They are horrible on a square grid. So in 4E with it's bias towards all things square (it's hip to be square!), they have made spheres and cones into cubes with the awesome power of their non-Euclidian Mathmagicians. Even the *bushes* on the battle grids for KotS are kind of squared off. Perhaps the gnomes are sneaking around clipping the hedges throughout the woodlands into nice even squares, which would explain why you find them in gardens all the time pretending to be statuary. </p><p></p><p>In any case, I will count out the number of squares affected by various blast radii, and come up with some cone templates of about the right size. Perhaps for some attack types such as lightning the blast should be a line effect. That should be fairly easy to adjudicate if you decide to go that route. Don't restrict yourself to cubes! </p><p></p><p>I know that the number of hexes affected by a burst 1 radius is smaller than the number of squares would be, but as you already pointed out, the number of people who can surround you is also less on a hex grid than a square one. I think the trade off is even there. Furthermore, I can't imagine 8 people being able to surround one humanoid without sharing "squares". They wouldn't all be able to swing a sword freely. Even six guys is kind of pushing that, but is more realistic. </p><p></p><p>We're going to keep using our Chessex hex grid, and convert spell effects over to hexes. I'll work on some templates for cones in my copious free time. Heh. Personally I hate the firecubes and sqared off caverns, bushes, and architecture that 4E seems to have embraced. I have no trouble drawing square buildings on a hex map, as I make use of an arcane device called a <em>ruler</em> to assist me. So WotC can be square if they want to, but I'm all over the hexes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zinovia, post: 4264769, member: 57373"] I haven't closely examined the blast effects to the point of counting how many squares are affected, but my take on converting those to a hex grid was to make them what they should have been in the first place – [b]cones[/b]. Cones work great on a hex grid. They are horrible on a square grid. So in 4E with it's bias towards all things square (it's hip to be square!), they have made spheres and cones into cubes with the awesome power of their non-Euclidian Mathmagicians. Even the *bushes* on the battle grids for KotS are kind of squared off. Perhaps the gnomes are sneaking around clipping the hedges throughout the woodlands into nice even squares, which would explain why you find them in gardens all the time pretending to be statuary. In any case, I will count out the number of squares affected by various blast radii, and come up with some cone templates of about the right size. Perhaps for some attack types such as lightning the blast should be a line effect. That should be fairly easy to adjudicate if you decide to go that route. Don't restrict yourself to cubes! I know that the number of hexes affected by a burst 1 radius is smaller than the number of squares would be, but as you already pointed out, the number of people who can surround you is also less on a hex grid than a square one. I think the trade off is even there. Furthermore, I can't imagine 8 people being able to surround one humanoid without sharing "squares". They wouldn't all be able to swing a sword freely. Even six guys is kind of pushing that, but is more realistic. We're going to keep using our Chessex hex grid, and convert spell effects over to hexes. I'll work on some templates for cones in my copious free time. Heh. Personally I hate the firecubes and sqared off caverns, bushes, and architecture that 4E seems to have embraced. I have no trouble drawing square buildings on a hex map, as I make use of an arcane device called a [i]ruler[/i] to assist me. So WotC can be square if they want to, but I'm all over the hexes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
hex rules for 4E?
Top